Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33523175›Full record

ArticleEmerging topics in life sciences2019

Synthetic tissues.

Hagan Bayley, Idil Cazimoglu, Charlotte E G Hoskin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging topics in life sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Stimuli-responsive vesicles as distributed artificial organelles for bacterial activation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A four-track perspective for bottom-up synthetic cells.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hagan BayleyDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K.
Idil CazimogluDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K.
Charlotte E G HoskinDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While significant advances have been achieved with non-living synthetic cells built from the bottom-up, less progress has been made with the fabrication of synthetic tissues built from such cells. Synthetic tissues comprise patterned three-dimensional (3D) collections of communicating compartments. They can include both biological and synthetic parts and may incorporate features that do more than merely mimic nature. 3D-printed materials based on droplet-interface bilayers are the basis of the most advanced synthetic tissues and are being developed for several applications, including the controlled release of therapeutic agents and the repair of damaged organs. Current goals include the ability to manipulate synthetic tissues by remote signaling and the formation of hybrid structures with fabricated or natural living tissues.

Indexed as

3D printingartificialdropletssynthetic biologysynthetic cellstissues

Identifiers

PMID33523175
PMCPMC7289033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.