Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33522981›Full record

Trial reportJMIR mHealth and uHealth2021

Addressing Implementation Challenges to Digital Care Delivery for Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Stakeholder Feedback in a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Kelly Williams, Sarah Markwardt, Shannon M Kearney, Jordan F Karp, Kevin L Kraemer, Margaret J Park, Paul Freund, Andrew Watson, James Schuster, Ellen Beckjord

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03451630 (Leveraging Integrated Models of Care to Improve Patient-Centered Outcomes for Publicly-Insured Adults With Complex Health Care Needs), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03451630 nacompletednot on this map

Leveraging Integrated Models of Care to Improve Patient-Centered Outcomes for Publicly-Insured Adults With Complex Health Care Needs

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2018 to 2022Enrolled1,400ConditionsDiabetes, Asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, HypertensionArmsHigh-Touch, High-Tech, Optimal Discharge Planning
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly Williams *UPMC Center for High-Value Health Care, Insurance Services Division, UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0217-5800
Sarah Markwardt *UPMC Center for High-Value Health Care, Insurance Services Division, UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6250-5985
Shannon M Kearney *UPMC Center for High-Value Health Care, Insurance Services Division, UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8355-0267
Jordan F Karp *Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine-Tucson, University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5171-5028
Kevin L Kraemer *Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine-Tucson, University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4937-0283
Margaret J Park *Community Wellness Consultancy, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1203-3013
Paul Freund *Consumer Action Response Team of Allegheny County, NAMI Keystone Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4768-9231
Andrew Watson *Department of Surgery, UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8546-5020
James Schuster *UPMC Center for High-Value Health Care, Insurance Services Division, UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3983-5219
Ellen Beckjord *UPMC Center for High-Value Health Care, Insurance Services Division, UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5291-2998
UPMC Center for High Value Health Care · USUniversity of Arizona · USAllegheny County · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital tools accessed via smartphones can promote chronic condition management, reduce disparities in health care and hospital readmissions, and improve quality of life. However, whether digital care strategies can be implemented successfully on a large scale with traditionally underserved populations remains uncertain.

objectiveAs part of a randomized trial comparing care delivery strategies for Medicaid and Medicare-Medicaid beneficiaries with multiple chronic conditions, our stakeholders identified implementation challenges, and we developed stakeholder-driven adaptions to improve a digitally delivered care management strategy (high-tech care).

methodsWe used 4 mechanisms (study support log, Patient Partners Work Group log, case interview log, and implementation meeting minutes) to capture stakeholder feedback about technology-related challenges and solutions from 9 patient partners, 129 participants, and 32 care managers and used these data to develop and implement solutions. To assess the impact, we analyzed high-tech care exit surveys and intervention engagement outcomes (video visits and condition-specific text message check-ins sent at varying intervals) before and after each solution was implemented.

resultsChallenges centered around 2 themes: difficulty using both smartphones and high-tech care components and difficulty using high-tech care components due to connectivity issues. To respond to the first theme's challenges, we devised 3 solutions: tech visits (eg, in-person technology support visits), tech packet (eg, participant-facing technology user guide), and tailored condition-specific text message check-ins. During the first 20 months of implementation, 73 participants received at least one tech visit. We observed a 15% increase in video call completion for participants with data before and after the tech visit (n=25) and a 7% increase in check-in completion for participants with data before and after the tech visit (n=59). Of the 379 participants given a tech packet, 179 completed care during this timeframe and were eligible for an exit survey. Of the survey respondents, 76% (73/96) found the tech packet helpful and 64% (62/96) actively used it during care. To support condition-specific text message check-in completion, we allowed for adaption of day and/or time of the text message with 31 participants changing the time they received check-ins and change in standard biometric settings with 13 physicians requesting personalized settings for participants. To respond to the second theme's challenges, tech visits or phone calls were made to demonstrate how to use a smartphone to connect or disconnect from the internet, to schedule video calls, or for condition-specific text message check-ins in a location with broadband/internet.

conclusionsHaving structured stakeholder feedback mechanisms is key to identify challenges and solutions to digital care engagement. Creating flexible and scalable solutions to technology-related challenges will increase equity in accessing digital care and support more effective engagement of chronically ill populations in the use of these digital care tools.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03451630; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03451630.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeText MessagingAdultAgedDelivery of Health CareFeedbackHumansMedicareUnited Statescare managementmobile phoneremote patient monitoringsmartphonestelehealth tools

Identifiers

PMID33522981
PMCPMC7884214
OpenAlexW3127517044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.