Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33522972›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2021

Web-Based Cognitive Testing of Older Adults in Person Versus at Home: Within-Subjects Comparison Study.

Andrée-Ann Cyr, Kristoffer Romero, Laura Galin-Corini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Accuracy of Reaction Time Measurement on Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metric UltraMobile.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025
    Observational
  8. Sex Matters: Association with Superager Classification and Risk Factors.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Feasibility of Remote Unsupervised Cognitive Screening With SATURN in Older Adults.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrée-Ann CyrDepartment of Psychology, Glendon Campus, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9036-2889
Kristoffer RomeroDepartment of Psychology, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3055-7112
Laura Galin-CoriniDepartment of Psychology, Glendon Campus, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3420-6977

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWeb-based research allows cognitive psychologists to collect high-quality data from a diverse pool of participants with fewer resources. However, web-based testing presents unique challenges for researchers and clinicians working with aging populations. Older adults may be less familiar with computer usage than their younger peers, leading to differences in performance when completing web-based tasks in their home versus in the laboratory under the supervision of an experimenter.

objectiveThis study aimed to use a within-subjects design to compare the performance of healthy older adults on computerized cognitive tasks completed at home and in the laboratory. Familiarity and attitudes surrounding computer use were also examined.

methodsIn total, 32 community-dwelling healthy adults aged above 65 years completed computerized versions of the word-color Stroop task, paired associates learning, and verbal and matrix reasoning in 2 testing environments: at home (unsupervised) and in the laboratory (supervised). The paper-and-pencil neuropsychological versions of these tasks were also administered, along with questionnaires examining computer attitudes and familiarity. The order of testing environments was counterbalanced across participants.

resultsAnalyses of variance conducted on scores from the computerized cognitive tasks revealed no significant effect of the testing environment and no correlation with computer familiarity or attitudes. These null effects were confirmed with follow-up Bayesian analyses. Moreover, performance on the computerized tasks correlated positively with performance on their paper-and-pencil equivalents.

conclusionsOur findings show comparable performance on computerized cognitive tasks in at-home and laboratory testing environments. These findings have implications for researchers and clinicians wishing to harness web-based testing to collect meaningful data from older adult populations.

Indexed as

agingcognitionmobile phoneneuropsychologyweb-based testing

Identifiers

PMID33522972
PMCPMC8081157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.