Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33522953›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2021

Association between perioperative fluid administration and postoperative outcomes: a 20-year systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized goal-directed trials in major visceral/noncardiac surgery.

Antonio Messina, Chiara Robba, Lorenzo Calabrò, Daniel Zambelli, Francesca Iannuzzi, Edoardo Molinari, Silvia Scarano, Denise Battaglini, Marta Baggiani, Giacomo De Mattei and 4 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
17.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05637606 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

HIgh Versus STAndard Blood Pressure Target in Hypertensive High-risk Patients: The HISTAP Randomized Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorHumanitas Clinical and Research CenterRan2023 to 2025Enrolled636ConditionsBlood Pressure, Complication,Postoperative, Intraoperative HypotensionArmsEphedrine, Norepinephrine, Etilefrine Hydrochloride bolus, Use of pulse pressure and stroke volume variation (PPV and SVV), use of Mini Fluid Challenge (mini_FC)
NCT06188299 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effects Of Intraoperative Different Fluid Therapy Protocols On Postoperative Renal Functions

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnkara City Hospital BilkentRan2022 to 2023Enrolled60ConditionsIntraoperative Fluid ManagementArmsRestricted Fluid Administration
NCT07510451 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Hypotension Prediction Index Software Compared With Standard Advanced Haemodynamic Monitoring in Patients Undergoing Major Aortic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPoznan University of Medical SciencesRan2026 to 2028Enrolled200ConditionsElective Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Surgery With an Expected Surgical Duration Exceeding 2 Hours, Elective Open Abdominal Aortic Surgery With an Expected Surgical Duration Exceeding 2 HoursArmsHPI guided heamodynamic monitoring, Standard Heamodynamic Managament according to APCO Monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio MessinaHumanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy. antonio.messina@humanitas.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9744-1659
Chiara RobbaAnesthesia and Intensive Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genoa, Italy.
Lorenzo CalabròHumanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
Daniel ZambelliHumanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
Francesca IannuzziDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Edoardo MolinariDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Silvia ScaranoDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Denise BattagliniDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Marta BaggianiAnesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Maggiore Della Carità University Hospital, Novara, Italy.
Giacomo De MatteiAnesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata Udine, Udine, Italy.
Laura SaderiClinical Epidemiology and Medical Statistics Unit, Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Giovanni SotgiuClinical Epidemiology and Medical Statistics Unit, Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Paolo PelosiAnesthesia and Intensive Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genoa, Italy.
Maurizio CecconiHumanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
Humanitas University · ITUniversity of Genoa · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversity of Sassari · ITOspedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAppropriate perioperative fluid management is of pivotal importance to reduce postoperative complications, which impact on early and long-term patient outcome. The so-called perioperative goal-directed therapy (GDT) approach aims at customizing perioperative fluid management on the individual patients' hemodynamic response. Whether or not the overall amount of perioperative volume infused in the context of GDT could influence postoperative surgical outcomes is unclear.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of GDT approach between study population and control group in reducing postoperative complications and perioperative mortality, using MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Clinical trials register. The enrolled studies were grouped considering the amount infused intraoperatively and during the first 24 h after the admission in the critical care unit (perioperative fluid).

resultsThe metanalysis included 21 RCTs enrolling 2729 patients with a median amount of perioperative fluid infusion of 4500 ml. In the studies reporting an overall amount below or above this threshold, the differences in postoperative complications were not statically significant between controls and GDT subgroup [43.4% vs. 34.2%, p value = 0.23 and 54.8% vs. 39.8%; p value = 0.09, respectively]. Overall, GDT reduced the overall rate of postoperative complications, as compared to controls [pooled risk difference (95% CI) = - 0.10 (- 0.14, - 0.07); Chi

conclusionsIrrespectively to the amount of perioperative fluid administered, GDT strategy reduces postoperative complications, but not perioperative mortality.

trial registrationCRD42020168866; Registration: February 2020 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=168866.

Indexed as

Fluid TherapyHumansMortalityOutcome Assessment, Health CarePerioperative CarePerioperative PeriodFluidsMetanalysisPerioperative goal-directed therapyPostoperative complicationsSurgerySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33522953
PMCPMC7849093
OpenAlexW3126900713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.