Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33522926›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

A hybrid, effectiveness-implementation research study protocol targeting antenatal care providers to provide female genital mutilation prevention and care services in Guinea, Kenya and Somalia.

Wisal Ahmed, Vernon Mochache, Karin Stein, Patrick Ndavi, Tammary Esho, Mamadou Dioulde Balde, Anne-Marie Soumah, Ahmed Diriye, Muna Abdi Ahmed, Max Petzold and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Wisal AhmedDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8155-8249
Vernon MochacheDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Karin SteinDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
Patrick NdaviDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Tammary EshoDepartment of Health System Management and Public Health, Technical University of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mamadou Dioulde BaldeCentre for Research in Reproductive Health in Guinea, Conakry, Guinea.
Anne-Marie SoumahCentre for Research in Reproductive Health in Guinea, Conakry, Guinea.
Ahmed DiriyeData and Research Solutions, Hargeisa, Somalia.
Muna Abdi AhmedData and Research Solutions, Hargeisa, Somalia.
Max PetzoldSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Christina PallittoDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland. pallittoc@who.int.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn settings with high prevalence of female genital mutilation (FGM), the health sector could play a bigger role in its prevention and care of women and girls who have undergone this harmful practice. However, ministries of health lack clear policies, strategic plans or dedicated funding to implement anti-FGM interventions. Along with limited relevant knowledge and skills to prevent the practice of FGM and care for girls and women living with FGM, health providers have limited interpersonal communication skills and self-efficacy, while some may have supportive attitudes towards FGM and its medicalization. We propose to test the effectiveness of a health system strengthening intervention that includes training antenatal care (ANC) providers on person-centred communication (PCC) for FGM prevention.

methodsThis will be a two-level, hybrid, effectiveness-implementation research study using a cluster randomized trial design in Guinea, Kenya and Somalia conducted over a 6 months period. In each country, within pre-selected regions/counties, 60 ANC clinics will be randomized to intervention and control arms. At baseline, all clinics will receive the level one intervention involving provision of FGM-related clinical guidelines and handbook as well as anti-FGM policies and posters. At month 3, intervention clinics will receive the level two intervention comprising of a training for ANC providers on PCC to challenge their FGM-related attitudes and build their communication skills to effectively provide FGM prevention counselling. A process evaluation will be conducted to understand 'how' and 'why' the intervention package achieves intended results. Multi-level regression modelling will be used for quantitative data analysis while qualitative data will be assessed using thematic content analysis to determine the effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability of the different intervention levels. DISCUSSION: The proposed study will strengthen the knowledge base regarding how to effectively involve health providers in FGM prevention and care.

trial registrationTrial registration and date: PACTR201906696419769 (June 3rd, 2019).

Indexed as

Circumcision, FemaleFemaleGuineaHealth PersonnelHumansKenyaPregnancyPrenatal CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSomaliaAntenatal care providersFemale genital mutilationGuineaHealth-sector involvementKenyaPerson-Centred communicationPreventionSomalia

Identifiers

PMID33522926
PMCPMC7848669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.