Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33522792›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2021

The Time Has Come for Quantitative Protein Mass Spectrometry Tests That Target Unmet Clinical Needs.

Nico P M Smit, L Renee Ruhaak, Fred P H T M Romijn, Mervin M Pieterse, Yuri E M van der Burgt, Christa M Cobbaert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Role of Clinical Glyco(proteo)mics in Precision Medicine.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Development of Tier 2 LC-MRM-MS protein quantification methods for liquid biopsies.Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nico P M SmitDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8166-5332
L Renee RuhaakDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3737-3807
Fred P H T M RomijnDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Mervin M PieterseDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Yuri E M van der BurgtDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0556-5564
Christa M CobbaertDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein mass spectrometry (MS) is an enabling technology that is ideally suited for precision diagnostics. In contrast to immunoassays with indirect readouts, MS quantifications are multiplexed and include identification of proteoforms in a direct manner. Although widely used for routine measurements of drugs and metabolites, the number of clinical MS-based protein applications is limited. In this paper, we share our experience and aim to take away the concerns that have kept laboratory medicine from implementing quantitative protein MS. To ensure added value of new medical tests and guarantee accurate test results, five key elements of test evaluation have been established by a working group within the European Federation for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Moreover, it is emphasized to identify clinical gaps in the contemporary clinical pathways before test development is started. We demonstrate that quantitative protein MS tests that provide an additional layer of clinical information have robust performance and meet long-term desirable analytical performance specifications as exemplified by our own experience. Yet, the adoption of quantitative protein MS tests into medical laboratories is seriously hampered due to its complexity, lack of robotization and high initial investment costs. Successful and widespread implementation in medical laboratories requires uptake and automation of this next generation protein technology by the In-Vitro Diagnostics industry. Also, training curricula of lab workers and lab specialists should include education on enabling technologies for transitioning to precision medicine by quantitative protein MS tests.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalibrationChemistry, ClinicalEvaluation Studies as TopicHumansMass SpectrometryPeptidesProteinsProteolysisPeptidesProteins

Identifiers

PMID33522792
PMCPMC7944566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.