ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2021
The design basis for the integrated and continuous biomanufacturing framework.
Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- High Cell Density Cultivation of HEK293 Cells Using a 2L Membrane-Stirred Bioreactor.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2026Article
- Asymmetric Dialysis: Truly Unified and Simultaneous Single-Pass Concentration and Buffer Exchange.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2026Article
- The landscape of antibody production systems: recombinant expression for research, diagnostics and therapy.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Monoclonal antibody therapies for COVID-19: lessons learned and implications for the development of future products.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2022Review
- The design basis for the integrated and continuous biomanufacturing framework.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2021Article
- A common framework for integrated and continuous biomanufacturing.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An 8 ton per year manufacturing facility is described based on the framework for integrated and continuous bioprocessing (ICB) common to all known biopharmaceutical implementations. While the output of this plant rivals some of the largest fed-batch plants in the world, the equipment inside the plant is relatively small: the plant consists of four 2000 L single-use bioreactors and has a maximum flow rate of 13 L/min. The equipment and facility for the ICB framework is described in sufficient detail to allow biopharmaceutical companies, vendors, contract manufacturers to build or buy their own systems. The design will allow the creation of a global ICB ecosystem that will transform biopharmaceutical manufacturing. The design is fully backward compatible with legacy fed-batch processes. A clinical production scale is described that can produce smaller batch sizes with the same equipment as that used at the commercial scale. The design described allows the production of as little as 10 g to nearly 35 kg of drug substance per day.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.