ArticleWorld journal of urology2021
The future of urology: nonagenarians admitted to a urological ward.
Article in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gross hematuria in nonagenarians admitted to a urological ward: prevalence, predictors, and outcomes.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Improving Outcomes in Urological Surgery for the Elderly: Strategies for Optimization and Risk Reduction.Current urology reports · 2025Review
- Urological hospitalization reasons and outcomes of octogenarians and nonagenarians: does age really matter? Erkan et al.World journal of urology · 2023Article
- Urological hospitalization reasons and outcomes of octogenarians and nonagenarians: does age really matter?World journal of urology · 2023Article
- Active stone removal is a safe option for ocotogenarians and nonagenarians with nephrolithiasis.World journal of urology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo analyze the outcome of nonagenarians with urological conditions. As demographic changes will lead to a substantial rise of geriatric patients in need of health care services and as little is known on the outcome of these patients, we retrospectively analyzed a consecutive series of nonagenarians admitted to our urological ward. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn a retrospective study we analyzed all nonagenarians admitted to our urological ward between 2014 and 2018. Patients were followed for 12 months and predictors for mortality were calculated.
resultsA total of 152 patients with a mean age of 92 years entered this study. The most frequent indications for admission were macrohematuria, bladder dysfunction, urinary tract infection, hydronephrosis and urinary retention. A history of bladder cancer was present in 18% and of renal cell cancer in 5% of patients. Prostate cancer was present in 21%. The most frequent invasive interventions were the insertion of an irrigation catheter, cystoscopy, bladder tumor resection and insertion of a DJ-catheter. The mean length of hospitalization was 6.5 days. In-house mortality was 9% and the 12 months mortality rate 45%. The strongest predictor for a 12 months mortality was the CSHA-Frailty Scale.
conclusionUrogerontology is one of the biggest challenges in our field. The cohort of nonagenarians studied herein demonstrates a high rate of invasive interventions, an acceptable length of hospitalization and an in-house mortality in the range of 9%. The 12 months mortality rate is almost 50% and predictors thereof, as elaborated, might aid in the disease management of this ever-increasing cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.