Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33521793›Full record

ArticleJASA express letters2021

Bilateral and bimodal cochlear implant listeners can segregate competing speech using talker sex cues, but not spatial cues.

Shelby Willis, Kevin Xu, Mathew Thomas, Quinton Gopen, Akira Ishiyama, John J Galvin, Qian-Jie Fu

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in JASA express letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Research status and progress of bilateral cochlear implantation].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Effect of cochlear implantation on speech recognition under different listening modes in children].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shelby WillisDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
Kevin XuDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
Mathew ThomasDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
Quinton GopenDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
Akira IshiyamaDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
John J GalvinHouse Ear Institute, 2100 West Third Street, Los Angeles, California 90057, USA SLWillis@mednet.ucla.edu, KevinXu@mednet.ucla.edu, mathewthomas@g.ucla.edu, QGopen@mednet.ucla.edu, AIshiyama@mednet.ucla.edu, jgalvin@hei.org, qfu@mednet.ucla.edu.
Qian-Jie FuDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3494-7633

Funding

Frequency mismatch and spectral integration in acoustic and electric hearingR01DC017738 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FU, QIAN-JIE · 2019 to 2023
$2.3M
Integration of acoustic and electric hearing within or across earsR01DC016883 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FU, QIAN-JIE · 2019 to 2023
$1.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016883NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017738
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cochlear implant (CI) users have greater difficulty perceiving talker sex and spatial cues than do normal-hearing (NH) listeners. The present study measured recognition of target sentences in the presence of two co-located or spatially separated speech maskers in NH, bilateral CI, and bimodal CI listeners; masker sex was the same as or different than the target. NH listeners demonstrated a large masking release with masker sex and/or spatial cues. For CI listeners, significant masking release was observed with masker sex cues, but not with spatial cues, at least for the spatially symmetrically placed maskers and listening task used in this study.

Identifiers

PMID33521793
PMCPMC7814501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.