ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2021
Stroke in patients infected by the novel coronavirus and its causal mechanisms: A narrative review.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neurological Complications of COVID-19 in the Elderly.Neuroscience and behavioral physiology · 2022Article
- Stroke in patients infected by the novel coronavirus and its causal mechanisms: A narrative review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe current study aimed to evaluate the mechanisms of stroke development during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and analyze the related characteristics, such as etiology, age group, associated comorbidities, and prognosis.
methodsA narrative was performed using the descriptors ["novel coronavirus"] AND ["stroke"] in the PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar, Lilacs, and Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS) databases, including studies published between December 1, 2019, and April 28, 2020.
resultsA total of 142 articles were identified, with 89 of them in the PubMed database, 46 in Science Direct, and 7 in Google Scholar. No articles were found using the defined keywords in the Lilacs and BVS databases. A total of 22 articles were included for final evaluation. We observed that infection by the novel coronavirus caused a greater risk of the occurrence of stroke, with several studies suggesting etiological mechanisms, such as the involvement of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, viral invasion, and hypoxia as well as the increase in D-dimer and the reduction in platelets, which had been commonly observed in COVID-19 cases. The most common complication of stroke was found among the elderly with preexisting comorbidities, mainly cardiovascular disease. We detected reports of strokes among young people with no preexisting risk factors for thromboembolic events, in which the mechanism related to the viral infection was the most probable cause. In this review, we confirmed that stroke is part of the spectrum of clinical manifestations resulting from COVID-19 and is associated with a worse prognosis. Cerebrovascular lesions resulting from complications of the infection by the novel coronavirus occurred as a result of ischemic, hemorrhagic, and/or thromboembolic etiologies.
conclusionThe occurrence of stroke during the pandemic as a result of the novel coronavirus has a multifactorial character, and emergency physicians should focus on systematic measures for its screening and accurate diagnosis as well as on appropriate interventions based on early decisionmaking that may have a favorable impact on reducing damage and saving lives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.