ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2021
Prevalence of undiagnosed HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C among patients in an Indian emergency department.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence of undiagnosed HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C among patients in an Indian emergency department.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2021Article
- Unravelling the Hidden and Undiagnosed Cases of Hepatitis B and C Viruses among Patients Seeking Health Care for Other Viral Illness: A Cross-Sectional Study from Central India.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social MedicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesHIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C remain significant causes of morbidity and mortality in low resource settings. Emergency department (ED)-based screening has proven effective in decreasing the spread of undiagnosed disease, although such programs are rare in low-middle income countries.
methodsA prospective, cross sectional study of all adult patients presenting to the ED in a 600-bed teaching hospital in Tamil Nadu, India. This study used an opt-in strategy in which patients were offered testing at the end of their ED visit. Costs of testing were paid out of pocket by patients. Patients with known HIV, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C were excluded from the study.
resultsDuring the study period 26,465 patients presented to the ED, and 18,286 patients consented to participate (68.9%). Among the 18,286 patients tested, 174 were positive for either HIV (39, 0.21%), hepatitis C (52, 0.28%), or hepatitis B (83, 0.45%). Three patients tested positive for both HIV and hepatitis C, and 1 patient tested positive for both HIV and hepatitis B. A total of 69.2% of patients with HIV, 61.2% of patients with hepatitis B, and 83% of patients with hepatitis C presented for reasons unrelated to their underlying diagnosis.
conclusionAlthough limited to only 1 hospital in southern India, this study represents the largest ED-based screening program for HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C ever conducted in India or any other low-middle income countries. The majority of patients presented for reasons unrelated to their underlying diagnosis. Future research is needed on implementation strategies, cost feasibility, and linkage to care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.