Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33521777›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2021

Does crowding influence emergency department treatment time and disposition?

Nathan R Hoot, Rosa C Banuelos, Yashwant Chathampally, David J Robinson, Benjamin W Voronin, Kimberly A Chambers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Factors affecting time-to-disposition at a district hospital emergency centre in Cape Town, South Africa.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Does crowding influence emergency department treatment time and disposition?Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nathan R HootDepartment of Emergency Medicine McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4566-8720
Rosa C BanuelosDepartment of Emergency Medicine McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas USA.
Yashwant ChathampallyDepartment of Emergency Medicine McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas USA.
David J RobinsonDepartment of Emergency Medicine McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas USA.
Benjamin W VoroninDepartment of Emergency Medicine McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas USA.
Kimberly A ChambersDepartment of Emergency Medicine McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to determine whether crowding influences treatment times and disposition decisions for emergency department (ED) patients.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study at 2 hospitals from January 1, 2014, to July 1, 2014. Adult ED visits with dispositions of discharge, admission, or transfer were included. Treatment times were modeled by linear regression with log-transformation; disposition decisions (admission or transfer vs discharge) were modeled by logistic regression. Both models adjusted for chief complaint, Emergency Severity Index (ESI), and 4 crowding metrics in quartiles: waiting count, treatment count, boarding count, and National Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale.

resultsWe included 21,382 visits at site A (12.9% excluded) and 29,193 at site B (15.0% excluded). Respective quartiles of treatment count increased treatment times by 7.1%, 10.5%, and 13.3% at site A (

conclusionsLocal crowding influenced ED treatment times and disposition decisions at 2 hospitals after adjusting for chief complaint and ESI.

Indexed as

crowdingefficiencyemergency departmentshospitalizationlength of staylogistic regressionlog‐linear models

Identifiers

PMID33521777
PMCPMC7819268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.