ArticleThe Lancet. Microbe2020
Co-infections: testing macrolides for added benefit in patients with COVID-19.
Article in The Lancet. Microbe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- mGem: Population genomics ofmBio · 2026Article
- Precision spatiotemporal analysis of large-scale compound-protein interactions through molecular dynamics simulation.PNAS nexus · 2025Article
- Genomic analysis ofiScience · 2024Article
- The Antibiotic Kitasamycin-A Potential Agent for Specific Fibrosis Preventing Therapy after Fistulating Glaucoma Surgery?Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- The SARS-CoV-2 helicase as a target for antiviral therapy: Identification of potential small molecule inhibitors by in silico modelling.Journal of molecular graphics & modelling · 2022Article
- COVID-19 and the Importance of Being Prepared: A Multidisciplinary Strategy for the Discovery of Antivirals to Combat Pandemics.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Pathogenesis and Management of COVID-19.Journal of xenobiotics · 2021Review
- COVID-19 drug practices risk antimicrobial resistance evolution.The Lancet. Microbe · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.