Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33521671›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Rheumatology2021

Clinical pathways for patients with giant cell arteritis during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international perspective.

Sarah L Mackie, Elisabeth Brouwer, Richard Conway, Kornelis S M van der Geest, Puja Mehta, Susan P Mollan, Lorna Neill, Michael Putman, Philip C Robinson, Sebastian E Sattui

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. An update on the clinical approach to giant cell arteritis.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Role of temporal artery resection in Horton's arteritis (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021
    Review
  15. Giant cell arteritis during COVID-19 pandemic.Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Sarah L MackieLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Elisabeth BrouwerDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Richard ConwayDepartment of Rheumatology, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Kornelis S M van der GeestDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Puja MehtaCentre for Inflammation and Tissue Repair, UCL Respiratory, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
Susan P MollanBirmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Lorna NeillPMR GCA Scotland, Perth, Scotland.
Michael PutmanMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Philip C RobinsonUniversity of Queensland Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Sebastian E SattuiDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Centre for Inflammation Research · GBHospital for Special Surgery · USLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBMedical College of Wisconsin · USSt. James's Hospital · IEUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

VCRC-VF FellowshipU54AR057319 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MERKEL, PETER A · 2009 to 2020
$12.5M
POSTDOCTORAL RHEUMATOLOGY TRAININGT32AR007611 · NIAMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI PERLMAN, HARRIS R · 2001 to 2022
$4.4M
Department of Health NIHR-CS-012-016Medical Research Council MR/N011775/1NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR007611NIAMS NIH HHS U54 AR057319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Giant cell arteritis, a common primary systemic vasculitis affecting older people, presents acutely as a medical emergency and requires rapid specialist assessment and treatment to prevent irreversible vision loss. Disruption of the health-care system caused by the COVID-19 pandemic exposed weak points in clinical pathways for diagnosis and treatment of giant cell arteritis, but has also permitted innovative solutions. The essential roles played by all professionals, including general practitioners and surgeons, in treating these patients have become evident. Patients must also be involved in the reshaping of clinical services. As an international group of authors involved in the care of patients with giant cell arteritis, we reflect in this Viewpoint on rapid service adaptations during the first peak of COVID-19, evaluate challenges, and consider implications for the future.

Identifiers

PMID33521671
PMCPMC7834492
OpenAlexW3111979572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.