Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33521637›Full record

ReviewNeuro-oncology advances2020

Feature-based PET/MRI radiomics in patients with brain tumors.

Philipp Lohmann, Anna-Katharina Meißner, Martin Kocher, Elena K Bauer, Jan-Michael Werner, Gereon R Fink, Nadim J Shah, Karl-Josef Langen, Norbert Galldiks

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuro-oncology advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Comparison of PET/CT and PET/MRI in central nervous system tumors, a narrative review.International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Feasibility of radiomic feature harmonization for pooling of [Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Molecular Biology in Treatment Decision Processes-Neuro-Oncology Edition.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Philipp LohmannInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5360-046X
Anna-Katharina MeißnerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Martin KocherInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.
Elena K BauerDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Jan-Michael WernerDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Gereon R FinkInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.
Nadim J ShahInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.
Karl-Josef LangenInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.
Norbert GalldiksInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiomics allows the extraction of quantitative features from medical images such as CT, MRI, or PET, thereby providing additional, potentially relevant diagnostic information for clinical decision-making. Because the computation of these features is performed highly automated on medical images acquired during routine follow-up, radiomics offers this information at low cost. Further, the radiomics features can be used alone or combined with other clinical or histomolecular parameters to generate predictive or prognostic mathematical models. These models can then be applied for various important diagnostic indications in neuro-oncology, for example, to noninvasively predict relevant biomarkers in glioma patients, to differentiate between treatment-related changes and local brain tumor relapse, or to predict treatment response. In recent years, amino acid PET has become an important diagnostic tool in patients with brain tumors. Therefore, the number of studies in patients with brain tumors investigating the potential of PET radiomics or combined PET/MRI radiomics is steadily increasing. This review summarizes current research regarding feature-based PET as well as combined PET/MRI radiomics in neuro-oncology.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebrain metastasesgliomahybrid imagingmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID33521637
PMCPMC7829472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.