Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33521613›Full record

ArticleCJC open2021

Cardiac Rehabilitation in Canada During COVID-19.

Susan Marzolini, Gabriela Lima de Melo Ghisi, Andrée-Anne Hébert, Shobhit Ahden, Paul Oh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CJC open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinician's Commentary on Moncion et al.Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Breast cancer survivors' physical activity and experiences while transitioning to a virtual cardiovascular rehabilitation program during a pandemic (COVID-19).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Financial Analysis of Cardiac Rehabilitation and the Impact of COVID-19.Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Cardiac rehabilitation via telerehabilitation in COVID-19 pandemic situation.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Susan MarzoliniKITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehab-University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gabriela Lima de Melo GhisiKITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehab-University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andrée-Anne HébertProgramme de Prévention Secondaire et Réadaptation Cardiovasculaire (PREV), Centre Intégré de Santé et Services Sociaux (CISSS) de Chaudière-Appalaches, Lévis, Québec, Canada.
Shobhit AhdenDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Paul OhKITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehab-University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University Health Network · CACentre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac rehabilitation programs (CRPs) had to change quickly in response to a shift in clinical priorities related to to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Yet, no study has examined the effect of COVID-19 on CRPs and if there has been an adequate transition to alternative programming.

methodsTo examine the status of CRPs during the COVID-19 pandemic, a web-based questionnaire was completed by CRP managers from April 23rd to May 14th, 2020.

resultsOverall, 114 representatives of 144 CRPs (79.1% of Canadian programs) responded. Of respondents, 41.2% (n = 47) reported CRP closure; primary reasons were staff redeployment and facility closure (41% of 51 responses, for both). Redeployment occurred in open CRPs and closed CRPs (30% ± 34% and 47% ± 38% of employees, respectively;

conclusionsWithin 2-months of COVID-19 being declared a pandemic, 41.2% of CRPs were closed and almost half of employees redeployed. Less time-efficient one-to-one models of remote care, mostly by phone/e-mail, were adopted. Vulnerable populations were disproportionately affected, becoming ineligible owing to safety concerns. Strategies to open closed CRPs, admission of high-risk/vulnerable populations, and offering of group-based tele-rehabilitation should be a national priority.

Identifiers

PMID33521613
PMCPMC7833488
OpenAlexW3091673987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.