Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33521484›Full record

Trial reportPain reports

The ACTTION Guide to Clinical Trials of Pain Treatments, part II: mitigating bias, maximizing value.

Robert H Dworkin, Robert D Kerns, Michael P McDermott, Dennis C Turk, Christin Veasley

Abstract readClinical TrialReview
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert H DworkinDepartments of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Neurology, and Psychiatry, Center for Health + Technology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
Robert D KernsDepartments of Psychiatry, Neurology, and Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Michael P McDermottDepartments of Biostatistics and Computational Biology and Neurology, Center for Health + Technology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
Dennis C TurkDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Christin VeasleyChronic Pain Research Alliance, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Summaries of the articles included in part II of the ACTTION Guide to Clinical Trials of Pain Treatments are followed by brief overviews of methodologic considerations involving precision pain medicine, pragmatic clinical trials, real world evidence, and patient engagement in clinical trials.

Identifiers

PMID33521484
PMCPMC7838005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.