Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33521413›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in physiology2021

Against gustotopic representation in the human brain: There is no Cartesian Restaurant.

Jason A Avery

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Chemosensory tobacco product toxicology part 2: toxicological testing, assays, and state of the science.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Review
  3. Chemosensory tobacco product toxicology part 1: sensory mechanisms.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Encoding Taste: From Receptors to Perception.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jason A AveryLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, United States, 20892.
National Institute of Mental Health · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 MH999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The insular cortex is still one of the least understood cortical regions in the human brain. This review will highlight research on taste quality representation within the human insular cortex. Much of the controversy surrounding this topic is based in the ongoing debate over different theories of peripheral taste coding. When translated to the study of gustatory cortex, this has generated a distinct set of theoretical models, namely the

Indexed as

fMRIInsulaMVPAtaste

Identifiers

PMID33521413
PMCPMC7839947
OpenAlexW3120269391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.