Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33521400›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2021

Acute Peritoneal Dialysis With Percutaneous Catheter Insertion for COVID-19-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Intensive Care: Experience From a UK Tertiary Center.

Elaine Bowes, Jennifer Joslin, Dandisonba C B Braide-Azikiwe, Caroline Tulley, Kate Bramham, Sujit Saha, Satish Jayawardene, Babakang Shakoane, C Jason Wilkins, Sam Hutchings and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. COVID-19 and Acute Kidney Injury.Critical care clinics · 2022
    Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elaine BowesKing's Kidney Care, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Jennifer JoslinKing's Kidney Care, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Dandisonba C B Braide-AzikiweKing's Kidney Care, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Caroline TulleyKing's Kidney Care, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Kate BramhamKing's Kidney Care, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Sujit SahaKing's Kidney Care, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Satish JayawardeneKing's Kidney Care, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Babakang ShakoaneKing's Kidney Care, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
C Jason WilkinsKing's Kidney Care, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Sam HutchingsFaculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, UK.
Philip HopkinsDepartment of Critical Care, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Eirini LioudakiKing's Kidney Care, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Catriona ShawKing's Kidney Care, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Hugh CairnsKing's Kidney Care, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Claire C SharpeKing's Kidney Care, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDuring the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020, high rates of acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically unwell patients are being reported, leading to an increased demand for renal replacement therapy (RRT). Providing RRT for this large number of patients is proving challenging, and so alternatives to continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT) in the intensive care unit (ICU) are needed. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) can be initiated immediately after percutaneous insertion of the catheter, but there are concerns about impact on ventilation and RRT efficacy. We sought to describe our recent experience with percutaneous catheter insertion and peritoneal dialysis in patients in the ICU with COVID-19 infection.

methodPatients were selected according to local protocol, and catheters were inserted percutaneously by experienced operators using a Seldinger technique. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and ventilation requirements were recorded at the time of insertion and 24 hours later. Procedural complications, proportion of RRT provided by PD, renal recovery, and RRT parameters (serum potassium and maximum base excess) during PD were assessed.

resultsPercutaneous PD catheters were successfully inserted in 37 of 44 patients (84.1%) after a median of 13.5 days (interquartile range [IQR] = 10.0, 20.3 days) in the ICU. No adverse events were reported; SOFA scores and ventilation requirements were comparable before and after insertion; and adequate RRT parameters were achieved. The median proportion of RRT provided by PD following catheter insertion was 94.6% (IQR = 75.0, 100%).

conclusionPeritoneal dialysis provides a safe and effective alternative to CRRT in selected patients with AKI and COVID-19 infection requiring ventilation on intensive care.

Indexed as

acute kidney injuryCOVID-19percutaneous catheter insertionperitoneal dialysis

Identifiers

PMID33521400
PMCPMC7836882
OpenAlexW3111128757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.