ArticleGene reports2021
Genome-wide
Article in Gene reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- In silico mining of microsatellites from the Phlebotomus argentipes (Diptera: Psychodidae) scaffold-level genome assembly and validation of eleven genotyping markers.Research square · 2026Article
- Insights into Genomic Dynamics and Plasticity in the Monkeypox Virus from the 2022 Outbreak.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Two short low complexity regions (LCRs) are hallmark sequences of the Delta SARS-CoV-2 variant spike protein.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Investigating the possible origin and transmission routes of SARS-CoV-2 genomes and variants of concern in Bangladesh.Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) or, Microsatellites are short repeat sequences that have been extensively studied in eukaryotic (plants) and prokaryotic (bacteria) organisms. Compared to other organisms, the presence and incidence of SSR on viral genomes are less studied. With the emergence of novel infectious viruses over the past few decades, it is imperative to study the genetic diversity in such viruses to predict their evolutionary and functional changes over time. Following the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, we have assembled 121 complete genomes reported from 31 countries across the six continents for the identification and characterization of SSR repeats. Using two independent SSR identification tools, we have found remarkable consistency in the diversity of microsatellites pattern (38-42 per genome) found in the 121 analyzed SARS-CoV-2 genomes indication their important role for genome stability. Among the identified motifs, trinucleotide and hexanucleotide repeats were found to be the most abundant form followed by mono- and di-nucleotide. There were no tetra- or penta-nucleotide repeats in the analyzed SARS-CoV-2 genomes. The discovery of microsatellites in SARS-CoV-2 genomes may become useful for the population genetics, evolutionary analysis, strain identification and genetic variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.