ArticleHeliyon2021
Normative theory of visual receptive fields.
Article in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Covariant spatio-temporal receptive fields for spiking neural networks.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Do the receptive fields in the primary visual cortex span a variability over the degree of elongation of the receptive fields?Journal of computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Relationships between the degrees of freedom in the affine Gaussian derivative model for visual receptive fields and 2-D affine image transformations with application to covariance properties of simple cells in the primary visual cortex.Biological cybernetics · 2025Article
- Orientation selectivity properties for the affine Gaussian derivative and the affine Gabor models for visual receptive fields.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Determination of the Time-frequency Features for Impulse Components in EEG Signals.Neuroinformatics · 2025Article
- Orientation selectivity properties for integrated affine quasi quadrature models of complex cells.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Binocular luster elicited by isoluminant chromatic stimuli relies on mechanisms similar to those in the achromatic case.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Covariance properties under natural image transformations for the generalised Gaussian derivative model for visual receptive fields.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023Article
- Bio-inspired contour extraction via EM-driven deformable and rotatable directivity-probing mask.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Directional Preference in Avian Midbrain Saliency Computing Nucleus Reflects a Well-Designed Receptive Field Structure.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Maximal Dependence Capturing as a Principle of Sensory Processing.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Article
- Reconstructing Group Wavelet Transform From Feature Maps With a Reproducing Kernel Iteration.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article gives an overview of a normative theory of visual receptive fields. We describe how idealized functional models of early spatial, spatio-chromatic and spatio-temporal receptive fields can be derived in a principled way, based on a set of axioms that reflect structural properties of the environment in combination with assumptions about the internal structure of a vision system to guarantee consistent handling of image representations over multiple spatial and temporal scales. Interestingly, this theory leads to predictions about visual receptive field shapes with qualitatively very good similarities to biological receptive fields measured in the retina, the LGN and the primary visual cortex (V1) of mammals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.