Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33521235›Full record

ReviewAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)2020

Effects of physical activities on dementia-related biomarkers: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Mohammad Moniruzzaman, Aya Kadota, Maksudul Shadat Akash, Patrick J Pruitt, Katsuyuki Miura, Roger Albin, Hiroko H Dodge

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. The importance of modifiable lifestyle factors for episodic memory: a gradient boosted tree analysis.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohammad MoniruzzamanCenter for Epidemiologic Research in Asia (CERA) Shiga University of Medical Science Otsu Japan.
Aya KadotaCenter for Epidemiologic Research in Asia (CERA) Shiga University of Medical Science Otsu Japan.
Maksudul Shadat AkashDepartment of Epidemiology Bangladesh University of Health Sciences Dhaka Bangladesh.
Patrick J PruittInstitute of Gerontology, Wayne State University Detroit Michigan USA.
Katsuyuki MiuraCenter for Epidemiologic Research in Asia (CERA) Shiga University of Medical Science Otsu Japan.
Roger AlbinVAAAHS Neurology Service & GRECC Ann Arbor Michigan USA.
Hiroko H DodgeCenter for Epidemiologic Research in Asia (CERA) Shiga University of Medical Science Otsu Japan.

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG066518 · NIA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Zachary Beattie · 2020 to 2026
$28.6M
Outreach, Recruitment and Education CoreP30AG008017 · NIA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI KAYE, JEFFREY A · 1990 to 2019
$27.7M
Michigan Alzheimer's Disease Core CenterP30AG053760 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ALBIN, ROGER L · 2016 to 2020
$10.1M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG008017NIA NIH HHS P30 AG053760NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPhysical activities (PA) may lead to improved cognition in mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and dementia. The mechanisms mediating potential PA effects are unknown. Assessment of PA effects on relevant biomarkers may provide insights into mechanisms underlying potential PA effects on cognition.

methodsWe systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that studied PA effects on biomarkers in MCI, AD, and dementia populations. We examined whether biological mechanisms were hypothesized to explain associations among PA, biomarkers, and cognitive functions. We used the PubMed database and searched for RCTs with PA until October 31, 2019.

resultsOf 653 studies examining changes in biomarkers in PA trials, 18 studies met inclusion criteria for the present review. Some studies found favorable effects of PA on neurotrophic and inflammatory biomarkers. AD pathological markers were rarely investigated, with inconclusive results. Most studies were relatively small in sample size, of limited duration, and not all studies compared the changes in biomarkers between the control and experimental groups. DISCUSSION: There is only limited use of potentially informative biomarkers in PA trials for MCI, AD, and dementia. Most studies did not examine the role of biomarkers to study associations between PA and cognitive functions in their analyses. Several potential biomarkers remain uninvestigated. Careful use of biomarkers may clarify mechanisms underlying PA effects on cognition. Our review serves as a useful resource for developing future PA RCTs aimed at improving cognitive functions in MCI, AD, and dementias.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseasebiomarkers related to dementiabrain healthdementiaexercisemild cognitive impairmentneurobiological biomarkersphysical activityunderlying mechanism

Identifiers

PMID33521235
PMCPMC7816814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.