ArticleArthroplasty today2021
Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Superior to Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy in Terms of Pain Relief for Patients With Osteoarthritis.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural Gains Without Symptomatic Benefit After Microfracture During High Tibial Osteotomy.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Polydactyly-derived allogeneic chondrocyte cell-sheet transplantation with high tibial osteotomy as regenerative therapy for knee osteoarthritis.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobally, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is widely performed on patients with osteoarthritis. Meanwhile, open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) has garnered attention in our country as a joint-preserving procedure. This study aimed to retrospectively compare the postoperative clinical outcomes of TKA and OWHTO for patients with osteoarthritis.
methodsWe selected 94 patients (106 knees) who underwent OWHTO or TKA between 2013 and 2018, had complete clinical data, and were followed up for >2 years. Patients were classified into 2 groups depending on the procedure (TKA: n = 49; OWHTO: n = 45). Patients in the A (= arthroplasty) group were significantly older, with a worse range of motion (ROM) than those in the O (osteotomy) group. There were no significant differences regarding sex and body mass index between groups. Operative time, perioperative blood loss, knee ROM, and Japanese Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (J-KOOS) were compared between the groups.
resultsSignificant differences were found between the A and O groups regarding operative time (120 ± 27.2 vs 80.3 ± 23.3 minutes), perioperative blood loss (505.4 ± 271.8 vs 322.6 ± 196.1 mL), knee ROM (flexion; 123.4 ± 16.3° vs 133.7 ± 12.8°), and J-KOOS for pain (87.4 ± 12.5 vs 78.1 ± 15.2 points) and symptoms (86.6 ± 12.3 vs 79.1 ± 13.3 points). There were no significant differences regarding other J-KOOS subscales.
conclusionsOWHTO involved shorter operative times and less blood loss. However, the O group reported less pain relief. The A group represents an older, likely less active patient population. Therefore, OWHTO is a possible joint-preserving treatment options in younger active patients who may not be interested in arthroplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.