ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2020
Estimating Dining Plate Size From an Egocentric Image Sequence Without a Fiducial Marker.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the extreme importance of food intake in human health, it is currently difficult to conduct an objective dietary assessment without individuals' self-report. In recent years, a passive method utilizing a wearable electronic device has emerged. This device acquires food images automatically during the eating process. These images are then analyzed to estimate intakes of calories and nutrients, assisted by advanced computational algorithms. Although this passive method is highly desirable, it has been thwarted by the requirement of a fiducial marker which must be present in the image for a scale reference. The importance of this scale reference is analogous to the importance of the scale bar in a map which determines distances or areas in any geological region covered by the map. Likewise, the sizes or volumes of arbitrary foods on a dining table covered by an image cannot be determined without the scale reference. Currently, the fiducial marker (often a checkerboard card) serves as the scale reference which must be present on the table before taking pictures, requiring human efforts to carry, place and retrieve the fiducial marker manually. In this work, we demonstrate that the fiducial marker can be eliminated if an individual's dining location is fixed and a one-time calibration using a circular plate of known size is performed. When the individual uses another circular plate of an unknown size, our algorithm estimates its radius using the range of pre-calibrated distances between the camera and the plate from which the desired scale reference is determined automatically. Our comparative experiment indicates that the mean absolute percentage error of the proposed estimation method is ~10.73%. Although this error is larger than that of the manual method of 6.68% using a fiducial marker on the table, the new method has a distinctive advantage of eliminating the manual procedure and automatically generating the scale reference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.