Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33520992›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2020

Biological Roles and Delivery Strategies for Ions to Promote Osteogenic Induction.

Elia Bosch-Rué, Leire Diez-Tercero, Barbara Giordano-Kelhoffer, Luis M Delgado, Begoña M Bosch, Mireia Hoyos-Nogués, Miguel Angel Mateos-Timoneda, Phong A Tran, Francisco Javier Gil, Roman A Perez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Harnessing strontium in regenerative dentistry: progress and perspectives.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Bioactive elements manipulate bone regeneration.Biomaterials translational · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Peptides for Coating TiOInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Effect of CaPolymers · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elia Bosch-RuéBioengineering Institute of Technology, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Leire Diez-TerceroBioengineering Institute of Technology, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Barbara Giordano-KelhofferBioengineering Institute of Technology, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Luis M DelgadoBioengineering Institute of Technology, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Begoña M BoschBioengineering Institute of Technology, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Mireia Hoyos-NoguésBioengineering Institute of Technology, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Miguel Angel Mateos-TimonedaBioengineering Institute of Technology, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Phong A TranCentre for Biomedical Technologies, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Francisco Javier GilBioengineering Institute of Technology, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Roman A PerezBioengineering Institute of Technology, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone is the most studied tissue in the field of tissue regeneration. Even though it has intrinsic capability to regenerate upon injury, several pathologies and injuries could hamper the highly orchestrated bone formation and resorption process. Bone tissue engineering seeks to mimic the extracellular matrix of the tissue and the different biochemical pathways that lead to successful regeneration. For many years, the use of extrinsic factors (i.e., growth factors and drugs) to modulate these biological processes have been the preferred choice in the field. Even though it has been successful in some instances, this approach presents several drawbacks, such as safety-concerns, short release profile and half-time life of the compounds. On the other hand, the use of inorganic ions has attracted significant attention due to their therapeutic effects, stability and lower biological risks. Biomaterials play a key role in such strategies where they serve as a substrate for the incorporation and release of the ions. In this review, the methodologies used to incorporate ions in biomaterials is presented, highlighting the osteogenic properties of such ions and the roles of biomaterials in controlling their release.

Indexed as

biomaterialsbonescaffoldstherapeutic ionstissue engineeringtissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID33520992
PMCPMC7841204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.