Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33520934›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2020

Development of a TSR-Based Method for Protein 3-D Structural Comparison With Its Applications to Protein Classification and Motif Discovery.

Sarika Kondra, Titli Sarkar, Vijay Raghavan, Wu Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarika KondraThe Center for Advanced Computer Studies, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA, United States.
Titli SarkarThe Center for Advanced Computer Studies, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA, United States.
Vijay RaghavanThe Center for Advanced Computer Studies, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA, United States.
Wu XuDepartment of Chemistry, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of protein 3-D structural comparison methods is important in understanding protein functions. At the same time, developing such a method is very challenging. In the last 40 years, ever since the development of the first automated structural method, ~200 papers were published using different representations of structures. The existing methods can be divided into five categories: sequence-, distance-, secondary structure-, geometry-based, and network-based structural comparisons. Each has its uniqueness, but also limitations. We have developed a novel method where the 3-D structure of a protein is modeled using the concept of Triangular Spatial Relationship (TSR), where triangles are constructed with the C

Indexed as

molecular dynamics simulationprotein classificationprotein conformational changeprotein secondary structureprotein structure and function relationprotein structure comparisonstructure motifstriangular spatial relationship

Identifiers

PMID33520934
PMCPMC7838567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.