Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33520918›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2020

Face Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Simple Protection Tool With Many Meanings.

Lucia Martinelli, Vanja Kopilaš, Matjaž Vidmar, Ciara Heavin, Helena Machado, Zoran Todorović, Norbert Buzas, Mirjam Pot, Barbara Prainsack, Srećko Gajović

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Pandemic Education-Insights into Teachers' Perceptions of Hygiene Measures in Schools Due to COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lucia MartinelliMUSE - Science Museum, Trento, Italy.
Vanja KopilašFaculty of Croatian Studies, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Matjaž VidmarInstitute for the Study of Science, Technology and Innovation, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Ciara HeavinBusiness Information Systems, Cork University Business School, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Helena MachadoCommunication and Society Research Centre, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Zoran TodorovićUniversity Hospital Medical Center "Bežanijska kosa", and University of Belgrade Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia.
Norbert BuzasDepartment of Health Economics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Mirjam PotDepartment of Political Science, Centre for the Study of Contemporary Solidarity (CeSCoS), University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Barbara PrainsackDepartment of Political Science, Centre for the Study of Contemporary Solidarity (CeSCoS), University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Srećko GajovićCroatian Institute for Brain Research, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wearing face masks is recommended as part of personal protective equipment and as a public health measure to prevent the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Their use, however, is deeply connected to social and cultural practices and has acquired a variety of personal and social meanings. This article aims to identify the diversity of sociocultural, ethical, and political meanings attributed to face masks, how they might impact public health policies, and how they should be considered in health communication. In May 2020, we involved 29 experts of an interdisciplinary research network on health and society to provide their testimonies on the use of face masks in 20 European and 2 Asian countries (China and South Korea). They reflected on regulations in the corresponding jurisdictions as well as the personal and social aspects of face mask wearing. We analyzed those testimonies thematically, employing the method of qualitative descriptive analysis. The analysis framed the four dimensions of the societal and personal practices of wearing (or not wearing) face masks: individual perceptions of infection risk, personal interpretations of responsibility and solidarity, cultural traditions and religious imprinting, and the need of expressing self-identity. Our study points to the importance for an in-depth understanding of the cultural and sociopolitical considerations around the personal and social meaning of mask wearing in different contexts as a necessary prerequisite for the assessment of the effectiveness of face masks as a public health measure. Improving the personal and collective understanding of citizens' behaviors and attitudes appears essential for designing more effective health communications about COVID-19 pandemic or other global crises in the future.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePublic OpinionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAttitude to HealthCOVID-19EuropeFemaleHumansMaleMasksMiddle AgedPandemicsPersonal Protective EquipmentSARS-CoV-2COVID-19face maskhealth communicationpersonal protecting equipmentphysical distancing

Identifiers

PMID33520918
PMCPMC7838459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.