Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33520882›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2020

Case Report: Prenatal Genetic Counseling to Parents of Fetuses Suspected of Having Ambiguous Genitalia.

Takeshi Sato, Tomohiro Ishii, Yu Yamaguchi, Yosuke Ichihashi, Daigo Ochiai, Hiroshi Asanuma, Tatsuo Kuroda, Tomonobu Hasegawa

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of differences of sex development in Japan.Clinical pediatric endocrinology : case reports and clinical investigations : official journal of the Japanese Society for Pediatric Endocrinology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Takeshi SatoDepartment of Pediatrics, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomohiro IshiiDepartment of Pediatrics, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yu YamaguchiDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Gunma Children's Medical Center, Gunma, Japan.
Yosuke IchihashiDepartment of Pediatrics, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Daigo OchiaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi AsanumaThe center for Differences of Sex Development, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tatsuo KurodaThe center for Differences of Sex Development, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomonobu HasegawaDepartment of Pediatrics, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The occurrence of fetuses suspected of having ambiguous genitalia will likely increase in the future. Currently, the impact of prenatal genetic counseling on parents' understanding and psychological preparedness has not been addressed. We provided prenatal genetic counseling to parents of two fetuses suspected of ambiguous genitalia. Case 1: At 22 weeks of gestation, swelling of the labia majora, and a clitoris-like structure were noted despite 46,XY detected in amniotic fluid cells. Case 2: At 28 weeks of gestation, bladder exstrophy and a scrotum-like structure were noted. At 32 weeks (Case 1) and 37 weeks (Case 2) of gestation, we shared information with parents regarding the possible difficulty of legal sex assignment at birth, and a scenario for registration of the birth certificate. At birth, both babies presented with ambiguous genitalia. For both cases, the parents remained calm on seeing their baby's genitalia for the first time. After a month, we shared medical information with parents, including karyotype, testosterone production capacity, and surgical schedule. In both cases parents assigned their respective baby's legal sex as male. Several months later, parents were questioned on prenatal genetic counseling. Case 1: Mother, "I was prepared to address our baby's genitalia calmly." Father, "I understood the procedure of legal sex assignment." Case 2: Mother, "Without counseling, I would have been more upset and worried." Father, "We were assured that multidisciplinary experts would support us." Prenatal genetic counseling provides reassurance to parents, who remain informed and emotionally secure throughout the legal sex assignment of their child.

Indexed as

ambiguous genitaliacase reportdifferences in sex developmentprenatal genetic counselingsex assignment

Identifiers

PMID33520882
PMCPMC7838588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.