Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33520719›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020

Machine Learning for Histologic Subtype Classification of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter Radiomics Study.

Fengchang Yang, Wei Chen, Haifeng Wei, Xianru Zhang, Shuanghu Yuan, Xu Qiao, Yen-Wei Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The [Cancers · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Artificial intelligence and machine learning for medical imaging: A technology review.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fengchang YangDepartment of Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Wei ChenDepartment of Implantology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Haifeng WeiFirst Clinical Medical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Xianru ZhangSchool of Control Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Shuanghu YuanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Xu QiaoSchool of Control Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yen-Wei ChenGraduate School of Information Science and Engineering, Ritsumeikan University, Shiga, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHistologic phenotype identification of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) is essential for treatment planning and prognostic prediction. The prediction model based on radiomics analysis has the potential to quantify tumor phenotypic characteristics non-invasively. However, most existing studies focus on relatively small datasets, which limits the performance and potential clinical applicability of their constructed models.

methodsTo fully explore the impact of different datasets on radiomics studies related to the classification of histological subtypes of NSCLC, we retrospectively collected three datasets from multi-centers and then performed extensive analysis. Each of the three datasets was used as the training dataset separately to build a model and was validated on the remaining two datasets. A model was then developed by merging all the datasets into a large dataset, which was randomly split into a training dataset and a testing dataset. For each model, a total of 788 radiomic features were extracted from the segmented tumor volumes. Then three widely used features selection methods, including minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance Feature Selection (mRMR), Sequential Forward Selection (SFS), and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) were used to select the most important features. Finally, three classification methods, including Logistics Regression (LR), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Random Forest (RF) were independently evaluated on the selected features to investigate the prediction ability of the radiomics models.

resultsWhen using a single dataset for modeling, the results on the testing set were poor, with AUC values ranging from 0.54 to 0.64. When the merged dataset was used for modeling, the average AUC value in the testing set was 0.78, showing relatively good predictive performance.

conclusionsModels based on radiomics analysis have the potential to classify NSCLC subtypes, but their generalization capabilities should be carefully considered.

Indexed as

classificationfeature selectionmachine learningnon-small cell lung cancerradiomics

Identifiers

PMID33520719
PMCPMC7840845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.