ArticleCureus2021
Antimicrobial Resistance Among Uropathogens: Surveillance Report From South India.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns and Proportion of Multidrug-Resistant Uropathogens in a Remote Tertiary Hospital in Bhutan: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Uropathogenic profiles and antibiotic resistance in gynecological cases: a microbial surveillance study from Northeast India.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Current status of antimicrobial resistance in Indian healthcare system: combating antimicrobial resistance with precision medicine.Frontiers in antibiotics · 2026Review
- Article
- Sensitivity and resistance pattern of uropathogens causing urinary tract infections among adults at a teaching hospital in South India - A retrospective analysis.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Article
- [Nine-year trend in Escherichia coli resistance to ciprofloxacin: cross-sectional study in a hospital in Colombia].Cadernos de saude publica · 2024Article
- Antibiotic prescription patterns in patients with suspected urinary tract infections in Ecuador.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) is one of the most common infections encountered in clinical practice. Evidence supports that empirical treatment guidelines based on local bacterial spectrum and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance provide the best clinical results and also prevent the emergence of resistant strains. Antimicrobial resistance has been increasing at an alarming rate throughout the world. This warrants continuous reporting and surveillance of the emergence of AMR among the uropathogens across regions and nations. Materials and methods A retrospective cross-sectional study using antibiograms of adult patients with culture-proven UTI during January 2011 and January 2017 was done. Comparative analysis was performed between the two study periods for the prevalence, changing trends of antimicrobial resistance, and usage of antimicrobials for testing. Results The commonest organism cultured during each study period was
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.