Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33520522›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

Frequency and Predictors of Pacifier Use in the Low Socioeconomic Group of Karachi, Pakistan: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Ramsha Riaz, Madiha Ahmed, Mariam Baloch, Syed Asad Hasan Rizvi, Naureen Shahid, Fatima Qadir Siddiqui, Muhammad S Haq, Sania Saleem

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ramsha RiazInternal Medicine, Dr Ruth KM Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK.
Madiha AhmedMedicine, Dr Ruth KM Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK.
Mariam BalochInternal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK.
Syed Asad Hasan RizviInternal Medicine, Dr Ruth KM Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK.
Naureen ShahidInternal Medicine, Dr Ruth KM Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK.
Fatima Qadir SiddiquiInternal Hospital, Dr Ruth KM Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK.
Muhammad S HaqInternal Medicine, Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK.
Sania SaleemResearch and Development, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Dow University of Health Sciences · PKCalifornia Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology (United States) · USKing Edward Medical University · PKIndira Gandhi Government Medical College & Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Pacifier use has been popular for ages. They are prevalent all over the world because of their various perceived benefits. On the other hand, there is a common belief that they do carry health risks as well. Due to these contradicting belief systems, the frequency of their use, and the factors that determine them, need to be thoroughly evaluated. Since Pakistan is a developing country with a low literacy rate, it can be implied that a vast majority of the country's population may lack awareness regarding the advantages and disadvantages of pacifier use, making them incapable of weighing associated risks versus benefits. The data evaluating these factors in this region are however scarce in the published literature. We, therefore, aimed to highlight the frequency and predictors of pacifier use in the low socioeconomic group of Karachi, Pakistan. Materials and methods A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of 300 mothers visiting a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. We included mothers who had at least one child under the age of two years, and whose child did not have any oro-nasal anomaly that could prevent them from sucking a pacifier. Data were collected using pre-tested questionnaires and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 23.0, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, US). Frequencies were calculated and presented in the form of tables. The chi-square test was used to determine the significance of all categorical variables. A P-value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results Almost half of our respondents (49%) gave pacifiers to their children. A significant number (59%) of these mothers were uneducated. Almost all (97%) of the users had annual household income less than 15,000 Pakistani rupees (PKR); 34% were primiparous and more than two-thirds (71%) had a normal vaginal delivery. Out of all the factors, maternal age less than 20, annual household income less than 15,000 PKR, and primiparity were significantly associated with pacifier use in mothers (P<0.05). Only a half of the users (51%) cleaned the pacifiers by boiling; one-fourth (25%) washed it with water only; while 18% washed it with soap and water. The majority (84%) of the mothers used the pacifier to soothe the baby when upset. Among mothers who did not use a pacifier, about a third (30%) did not do so as they believed it's a bad practice. About one-fourth (27%) believed it was unhygienic. Conclusions Our study highlights the gap in the awareness of mothers regarding pacifier use. Using this data, we can target to disseminate specific information to this population to integrate safe and healthy child care habits in society.

Indexed as

breast feedingdeveloping countriesfeeding infants and young childrenpacifierspaediatricspakistan

Identifiers

PMID33520522
PMCPMC7837666
OpenAlexW3114288532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.