ArticleCureus2020
Primary Bilateral High-Grade Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children: Management Perspective.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and multi-institutional validation of a deep learning model for grading of vesicoureteral reflux on voiding cystourethrogram: a retrospective multicenter study.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Transitional Metaplasia of Renal Collecting Ducts in Vesicoureteral Reflux and Chronic Pyelonephritis: An Immunohistochemical Study of a Case and Review of the Literature.Iranian journal of pathology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a common finding in the pediatric population with the risk of repeated infections and renal damage. There is little is known about the natural history of primary bilateral high-grade reflux. Herein we present our experience in the management of primary high-grade bilateral VUR and the long-term outcome of renal function in this specific group of patients. Materials and methods We retrospectively evaluated all patients with congenital bilateral VUR between 2006 and 2014. Records were reviewed for patient age at diagnosis, antenatal history, clinical presentation, the grade of VUR on voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG), presence of scars on dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scan, indications for surgical intervention, and surgical approaches. Clinical and radiological outcomes of this subgroup of patients were assessed. Results A total of 67 patients with bilateral VUR were identified, of whom 31 (20 boys and 11 girls) had primary high-grade (grade IV and V) bilateral VUR. The mean age at diagnosis was seven months. DMSA scans showed renal scars in 19 patients (61%) and eight of them were bilateral. Surgical intervention was necessary for 81% of patients with a success rate of 58% after endoscopic correction and 100% after reimplantation. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) developed in 13 patients (42%) after a mean follow-up of eight years. Conclusions Primary bilateral high-grade VUR carries a high rate of surgical intervention. The endoscopic correction has an acceptable success rate and efficient long-term outcome. Nevertheless, a significant proportion of patients progresses to CKD even after VUR management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.