Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33520434›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2021

Prediction of state anxiety by machine learning applied to photoplethysmography data.

David Perpetuini, Antonio Maria Chiarelli, Daniela Cardone, Chiara Filippini, Sergio Rinella, Simona Massimino, Francesco Bianco, Valentina Bucciarelli, Vincenzo Vinciguerra, Piero Fallica and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

David PerpetuiniDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1903-0501
Antonio Maria ChiarelliDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Daniela CardoneDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1506-1995
Chiara FilippiniDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Sergio RinellaPhysiology Section, Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9368-7088
Simona MassiminoPhysiology Section, Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Francesco BiancoInstitute of Cardiology, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9785-3402
Valentina BucciarelliInstitute of Cardiology, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Vincenzo VinciguerraSTMicroelectronics, ADG R&D, Catania, Italy.
Piero FallicaSTMicroelectronics, ADG R&D, Catania, Italy.
Vincenzo PerciavallePhysiology Section, Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Sabina GallinaDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Sabrina ConociSTMicroelectronics, ADG R&D, Catania, Italy.
Arcangelo MerlaDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
University of Chieti-Pescara · ITSTMicroelectronics (Italy) · ITUniversity of Catania · ITUniversità degli Studi di Enna Kore · ITUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the human behavior is influenced by both cognition and emotion, affective computing plays a central role in human-machine interaction. Algorithms for emotions recognition are usually based on behavioral analysis or on physiological measurements (e.g., heart rate, blood pressure). Among these physiological signals, pulse wave propagation in the circulatory tree can be assessed through photoplethysmography (PPG), a non-invasive optical technique. Since pulse wave characteristics are influenced by the cardiovascular status, which is affected by the autonomic nervous activity and hence by the psychophysiological state, PPG might encode information about emotional conditions. The capability of a multivariate data-driven approach to estimate state anxiety (SA) of healthy participants from PPG features acquired on the brachial and radial artery was investigated.

methodsThe machine learning method was based on General Linear Model and supervised learning. PPG was measured employing a custom-made system and SA of the participants was assessed through the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Y) test.

resultsA leave-one-out cross-validation framework showed a good correlation between STAI-Y score and the SA predicted by the machine learning algorithm (

Indexed as

Affective computingGeneral linear model (GLM)Machine learningPhotoplethysmography (PPG)State-trait anxiety inventory (STAI-Y)

Identifiers

PMID33520434
PMCPMC7812926
OpenAlexW3125295053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.