Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33520422›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021

Determinants of Test Variability in Scotopic Microperimetry: Effects of Dark Adaptation and Test Indices.

Giovanni Montesano, Timos K Naska, Bethany E Higgins, David M Wright, Ruth E Hogg, David P Crabb

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Assessment ofBiomedicines · 2025
    Article
  3. Exploring Scotopic Microperimetry as an Outcome Measure in Choroideremia.Translational vision science & technology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Microperimetry Reliability Assessed From Fixation Performance.Translational vision science & technology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Giovanni MontesanoOptometry and Visual Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.
Timos K NaskaCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Royal Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Bethany E HigginsOptometry and Visual Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.
David M WrightCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Royal Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Ruth E HoggCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Royal Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
David P CrabbOptometry and Visual Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.
City, University of London · GBRoyal Victoria Hospital · GBMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S003770/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To test the effect of different dark adaptation conditions and reliability indices on the variability of two color scotopic microperimetry. Methods: We analyzed data from 22 consecutive visually healthy adults. Scotopic microperimetry was performed (Macular Integrity Assessment microperimeter, CenterVue, Padua, Italy) with two wavelength stimuli, cyan (505 nm) and red (627 nm), after a dark adaptation time of 10, 20, or 30 minutes. All tests were repeated twice to measure test-retest variability with Bland-Altman plots. We also provide a method to more accurately quantify the false-positive (FP) responses based on response data (button pressing) from the device, similar to FP responses used in standard static perimetry. Data on fixation stability (95% bivariate contour ellipse area) and blind spot responses were also extracted. Their relationship with measured sensitivity (in decibels) and test-retest variability was quantified through linear mixed effect models. Results: Dark adaptation had a significant effect on the sensitivity (dB) measured with the cyan stimulus ( Conclusions: Dark adaptation protocols should be carefully standardized for scotopic testing, especially if a cyan stimulus is used. The proposed FP responses should be used to assess reliability of microperimetry examinations instead of other metrics. Translational Relevance: We developed a method to calculate a more accurate estimate of the FP responses using data available to all researchers, generalizable to all Macular Integrity Assessment microperimeter tests.

Indexed as

Visual FieldsVisual Field TestsAdultDark AdaptationHumansItalyReproducibility of Resultsdark adaptationmicroperimetryscotopic sensitivitytest–retest variability

Identifiers

PMID33520422
PMCPMC7814359
OpenAlexW3118713016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.