Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33520406›Full record

ArticleOncoimmunology2021

A gene expression signature associated with B cells predicts benefit from immune checkpoint blockade in lung adenocarcinoma.

Jan Budczies, Martina Kirchner, Klaus Kluck, Daniel Kazdal, Julia Glade, Michael Allgäuer, Mark Kriegsmann, Claus-Peter Heußel, Felix J Herth, Hauke Winter and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncoimmunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Immune Checkpoints in B Cells: Unlocking New Potentials in Cancer Treatment.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jan BudcziesInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martina KirchnerInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Klaus KluckInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Daniel KazdalInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Julia GladeInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael AllgäuerInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mark KriegsmannInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Claus-Peter HeußelTranslational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Felix J HerthTranslational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Hauke WinterTranslational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael MeisterTranslational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas MuleyTranslational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefan FröhlingGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Solange PetersDepartment of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Barbara SeligerInstitute for Medical Immunology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5544-4958
Peter SchirmacherInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael ThomasDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Petros ChristopoulosDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Albrecht StenzingerInstitute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DELuther University · KRUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) expands the therapeutic options for metastatic lung cancer nowadays representing a standard frontline strategy as monotherapy or combination therapy, as well as an option in oncogene-addicted NSCLC after exhaustion of targeted therapies. Predictive markers are urgently needed, since only a minority of patients benefits from ICB, while serious adverse effects of immunotoxicity may occur. The study cohort included 43 ICB-treated metastatic lung adenocarcinoma showing long-term response (n = 16), rapid progression (n = 21) or intermediate patterns of response (n = 6). Lung biopsies acquired before initiation of ICB were analyzed by targeted mRNA expression profiling of 770 genes. Level and proportions of 14 immune cell types were estimated using characteristic gene expression signatures. Abundance of B cells (HR = 0.66,

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungLung NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorB-LymphocytesHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsProspective StudiesTranscriptomeBiomarkers, TumorImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsB cellsimmune checkpoint blockadeLung adenocarcinomamRNA expressionresponse predictiontumor-infiltrating lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID33520406
PMCPMC7808386
OpenAlexW3120706113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.