ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2021
Mammary duct ectasia in adult females; risk factors for the disease, a case control study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Demographic characteristics and clinical analysis of patients with plasma cell mastitis: a single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- A hematological parameter-based model for distinguishing non-puerperal mastitis from invasive ductal carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMammary duct ectasia is a common clinical condition characterized by abnormal dilatation of the central milk ducts with chronic inflammation and fibrosis, it may affect one or both breasts. Patients may be completely asymptomatic or have mastalgia or nipple discharge which is usually from multiple ducts. It mostly affects females and is very rare in males. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis is a case control study which included 236 females grouped into two equal groups, the first group were patients with duct ectasia compared and the other one apparently healthy females and both groups were compared regarding different characteristics.
resultsMost patients were young with a mean age of 35 years, a most of them were overweight (42.4%) and obese (33.1%). Most were menstruating (86.4%) with regular cycles (79.7%). Most patients had breast pain (67.8%), tenderness (54.2%), and no nodularity (98.3%). About 47.5% had nipple discharge mostly from multiple ducts (43.2%), 52.5% had no discharge. There was a significant correlation between the development of duct ectasia and each of marital status, lactational status, coffee consumption, pain, nodularity, and breast tenderness (P values 0.026, 0.016, 0.034, 0.000, 0.000, and 0.000).
conclusionDuct ectasia is a very common complaint in females, it is commoner in overweight and obese females, married females and those with history of lactation. Coffee consumption may be a cause. The regularity of the menstruation has no correlation with its development. The presence of mastalgia, tenderness, and nodularity are highly suggestive for the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.