Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33520179›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2021

Comparing population trend estimates of migratory birds from breeding censuses and capture data at a spring migration bottleneck.

Ivan Maggini, Massimiliano Cardinale, Andrea Favaretto, Petr Voříšek, Fernando Spina, Francesco Maoret, Andrea Ferri, Sara Riello, Leonida Fusani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Diet of breeding Eleonora's falconEcology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ivan MagginiAustrian Ornithological Centre Konrad-Lorenz Institute of Ethology University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna Wien Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1528-2288
Massimiliano CardinaleDepartment of Aquatic Resources Institute of Marine Research Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Lysekil Sweden.
Andrea FavarettoCisca - Italian Centre of Research and Conservation of the Environment Cassino Italy.
Petr VoříšekCzech Society for Ornithology Prague Czech Republic.
Fernando SpinaInstitute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA) Ozzano dell'Emilia Italy.
Francesco MaoretCisca - Italian Centre of Research and Conservation of the Environment Cassino Italy.
Andrea FerriInstitute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA) Ozzano dell'Emilia Italy.
Sara RielloRiserva Naturale Statale "Isole di Ventotene e S. Stefano" Ventotene Italy.
Leonida FusaniAustrian Ornithological Centre Konrad-Lorenz Institute of Ethology University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna Wien Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Europe has a well-established network of breeding bird monitoring that is used to produce supranational indices of population trends for many species. However, a comparison of breeding bird censuses with other methods may be beneficial to confirm the validity of such indices. The aim of this study was to assess the value of standardized capture data of migratory birds at migration bottlenecks as an indicator of the effective breeding populations. One limitation to this method is that several populations are co-occurring at these bottlenecks and their catchment areas need to be clearly identified to allow extrapolation of population indices. Here, we used standardized trends in capture numbers of 30 species on the island of Ponza, a migration bottleneck in the central Mediterranean, and compared them to population trends estimated in the putative catchment breeding areas between 2005 and 2016. The catchment areas were identified through the analysis of ring recoveries during the breeding season of birds passing through Ponza. Our results show an agreement between the population trends observed on Ponza and those in the breeding areas in 15 out of 30 species. The correlations were strongest in species with a more robust definition of the catchment areas, that is, species with more than 10 recoveries, and for which the recoveries were most likely of breeding birds. The main reason for disagreement between the two indices in the remaining species might be related to different intensity of sampling in different areas. This issue can be solved by further developing monitoring projects in underrepresented countries, as well as by intensifying monitoring through ringing, both in the breeding grounds and at migration bottlenecks. These results show that spring migration monitoring at bottlenecks has the potential to provide a valuable complement and an independent control of breeding bird surveys, allowing raising early warnings of population declines and contributing to their conservation.

Indexed as

bird ringingmigratory bottleneckPECBMSPonzapopulation indices

Identifiers

PMID33520179
PMCPMC7820168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.