Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33520159›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2021

Identifying Priority Giant Anteater (

Ricardo Quiterio Sartori, Alessandro Garcia Lopes, Luiz Paulo Nogueira Aires, Rita de Cassia Bianchi, Cinara Cássia Brandão de Mattos, Adriana Coletto Morales, Lilian Castiglioni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Identifying Priority Giant Anteater (Ecology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ricardo Quiterio SartoriSchool of Biosciences, Humanities, and Exact Sciences Graduate Program in Biosciences São Paulo State University (UNESP) São José do Rio Preto São Paulo State Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4904-2853
Alessandro Garcia LopesSchool of Biosciences, Humanities, and Exact Sciences Graduate Program in Biosciences São Paulo State University (UNESP) São José do Rio Preto São Paulo State Brazil.
Luiz Paulo Nogueira AiresRio Preto University Center (UNIRP) São José do Rio Preto São Paulo State Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3229-9396
Rita de Cassia BianchiSchool of Agricultural and Veterinary Science São Paulo State University (UNESP) Jaboticabal São Paulo State Brazil.
Cinara Cássia Brandão de MattosSão José do Rio Preto Medical School (FAMERP) São José do Rio Preto São Paulo State Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4836-3113
Adriana Coletto MoralesSchool of Agricultural and Veterinary Science São Paulo State University (UNESP) Jaboticabal São Paulo State Brazil.
Lilian CastiglioniSchool of Biosciences, Humanities, and Exact Sciences Graduate Program in Biosciences São Paulo State University (UNESP) São José do Rio Preto São Paulo State Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Habitat loss is the main threat to biodiversity conservation worldwide. Some species may be particularly susceptible to the effects of fragmentation and the isolation of populations. The impacts of human activity on wild animal populations may be understood through relationships between individual genetic data and spatial landscape variables, particularly when considering local population dynamics influenced by fragmented habitats. Thus, the objective of this study was to analyze the population structure and genetic diversity of the giant anteater (

Indexed as

Brazilconservation geneticsgiant anteatermicrosatellite markerspopulation structureSão Paulo

Identifiers

PMID33520159
PMCPMC7820152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.