Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33520097›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of telerehabilitation2020

Telehealth for the Provision of Occupational Therapy: Reflections on Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Sue Dahl-Popolizio, Heidi Carpenter, Melissa Coronado, Nicholas J Popolizio, Connor Swanson

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of telerehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Rapid Reviews to Support Practice: A Guide for Professional Organization Practice Networks.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Experiences of the Occupational Therapists During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review.Journal of psychosocial rehabilitation and mental health · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sue Dahl-PopolizioArizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Heidi CarpenterBanner Health, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Melissa CoronadoNorthern Arizona University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Nicholas J PopolizioBoston College, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Connor SwansonNorthern Arizona University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Northern Arizona University · USArizona State University · USBanner Health · USBoston College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020, healthcare professionals worldwide abruptly shifted from an in-person to a telehealth service delivery model. Many did so without advanced training or preparation. This cross-sectional study explored how occupational therapy practitioners (OTPs) used telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic, and whether they found it to be an effective service delivery model that should be a permanent option for providing occupational therapy services. An online survey was disseminated; it included Likert scale questions, multiple option questions, and open-ended questions regarding telehealth use during the COVID-19 pandemic. Of the 230 respondents, 176 (77%) support telehealth as a substitute for in-person services; 179 (78%) support telehealth as a permanent option for occupational therapy service delivery. This information lends support to the uninterrupted use of telehealth by OTPs when government emergency orders in response to COVID-19 expire.

Indexed as

COVIDOccupational therapistOccupational therapyTelehealthTelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID33520097
PMCPMC7757642
OpenAlexW3112701392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.