ArticleDisease markers2020
15-lncRNA-Based Classifier-Clinicopathologic Nomogram Improves the Prediction of Recurrence in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in Disease markers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomarker Potential ofInternational journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Combining a machine-learning derived 4-lncRNA signature with AFP and TNM stages in predicting early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Construction of immune-related LncRNAs classifier to predict prognosis and immunotherapy response in thymic epithelial tumors.Bioscience reports · 2022Article
- Construction and validation of immune-related LncRNAs classifier to predict prognosis and immunotherapy response in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.World journal of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Development of a Predictive Nomogram for Estimating Medication Nonadherence in Hemodialysis Patients.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022Article
- LINC01419 Promotes the Proliferation of Hepatoma Cells by Recruiting XRCC5 and Regulating Its Phosphorylation to Repair DNA Damage.Disease markers · 2022Article
- Development and Validation of a Novel Mitochondrion and Ferroptosis-Related Long Non-Coding RNA Prognostic Signature in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- Construction of an HCC recurrence model basedon the investigation of immune-relatedlncRNAs and related mechanisms.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2021Article
- Long non-coding RNA NORAD promotes pancreatic cancer stem cell proliferation and self-renewal by blocking microRNA-202-5p-mediated ANP32E inhibition.Journal of translational medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOur study aims to develop a lncRNA-based classifier and a nomogram incorporating the genomic signature and clinicopathologic factors to help to improve the accuracy of recurrence prediction for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.
methodsThe lncRNA profiling data of 374 HCC patients and 50 normal healthy controls were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Using univariable Cox regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis, we developed a 15-lncRNA-based classifier and compared our classifier to the existing six-lncRNA signature. Besides, a nomogram incorporating the genomic classifier and clinicopathologic factors was also developed. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the genomic-clinicopathologic nomogram were determined by a concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve and were compared with the TNM staging system by the C-index and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to estimate the clinical value of our nomogram.
resultsFifteen relapse-free survival (RFS-) related lncRNAs were identified, and the classifier, consisting of the identified 15 lncRNAs, could effectively classify patients into the high-risk and low-risk subgroups. The prediction accuracy of the 15-lncRNA-based classifier for predicting 2-year and 5-year RFS was 0.791 and 0.834 in the training set and 0.684 and 0.747 in the validation set, respectively, which was better than the existing six-lncRNA signature. Moreover, the AUC of genomic-clinicopathologic nomogram in predicting RFS were 0.837 in the training set and 0.753 in the validation set, and the C-index of the genomic-clinicopathologic nomogram was 0.78 (0.72-0.83) in the training set and 0.71 (0.65-0.76) in the validation set, which was better than the traditional TNM stage and 15-lncRNA-based classifier. The decision curve analysis further demonstrated that our nomogram had a larger net benefit than the TNM stage and 15-lncRNA-based classifier. The results were confirmed externally.
conclusionCompared to the TNM stage, the 15-lncRNAs-based classifier-clinicopathologic nomogram is a more effective and valuable tool to identify HCC recurrence and may aid in clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.