Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33520004›Full record

ReviewArchaeological and anthropological sciences2021

Historical overview and new directions in bioarchaeological trace element analysis: a review.

Rachel Simpson, David M L Cooper, Treena Swanston, Ian Coulthard, Tamara L Varney

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archaeological and anthropological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
25.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Beginner's Guide for Using Bone in Marine Mammal Research.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Use of Intrinsic Markers for Studying the Migratory Movements of Bats.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel SimpsonDepartment of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9259-7021
David M L CooperDepartment of Anatomy, Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK Canada.
Treena SwanstonDepartment of Anthropology, Economics and Political Science, MacEwan University, Edmonton, AB Canada.
Ian CoulthardCanadian Light Source, Saskatoon, SK Canada.
Tamara L VarneyDepartment of Anthropology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON Canada.
Canadian Light Source (Canada) · CALakehead University · CAMacEwan University · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given their strong affinity for the skeleton, trace elements are often stored in bones and teeth long term. Diet, geography, health, disease, social status, activity, and occupation are some factors which may cause differential exposure to, and uptake of, trace elements, theoretically introducing variability in their concentrations and/or ratios in the skeleton. Trace element analysis of bioarchaeological remains has the potential, therefore, to provide rich insights into past human lifeways. This review provides a historical overview of bioarchaeological trace element analysis and comments on the current state of the discipline by highlighting approaches with growing momentum. Popularity for the discipline surged following preliminary studies in the 1960s to 1970s that demonstrated the utility of strontium (Sr) as a dietary indicator. During the 1980s, Sr/Ca ratio and multi-element studies were commonplace in bioarchaeology, linking trace elements with dietary phenomena. Interest in using trace elements for bioarchaeological inferences waned following a period of critiques in the late 1980s to 1990s that argued the discipline failed to account for diagenesis, simplified complex element uptake and regulation processes, and used several unsuitable elements for palaeodietary reconstruction (e.g. those under homeostatic regulation, those without a strong affinity for the skeleton). In the twenty-first century, trace element analyses have been primarily restricted to Sr and lead (Pb) isotope analysis and the study of toxic trace elements, though small pockets of bioarchaeology have continued to analyse multiple elements. Techniques such as micro-sampling, element mapping, and non-traditional stable isotope analysis have provided novel insights which hold the promise of helping to overcome limitations faced by the discipline. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12520-020-01262-4.

Indexed as

BioarchaeologyDiagenesisElement mappingMicro-samplingNon-traditional stable isotope analysisTrace element analysis

Identifiers

PMID33520004
PMCPMC7810633
OpenAlexW3118458408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.