Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33519925›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2020

A Density Peak-Based Method to Detect Copy Number Variations From Next-Generation Sequencing Data.

Kun Xie, Ye Tian, Xiguo Yuan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kun XieThe School of Computer Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, China.
Ye TianThe School of Computer Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, China.
Xiguo YuanThe School of Computer Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, China.
Xidian University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Copy number variation (CNV) is a common type of structural variations in human genome and confers biological meanings to human complex diseases. Detection of CNVs is an important step for a systematic analysis of CNVs in medical research of complex diseases. The recent development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms provides unprecedented opportunities for the detection of CNVs at a base-level resolution. However, due to the intrinsic characteristics behind NGS data, accurate detection of CNVs is still a challenging task. In this article, we propose a new density peak-based method, called dpCNV, for the detection of CNVs from NGS data. The algorithm of dpCNV is designed based on density peak clustering algorithm. It extracts two features, i.e., local density and minimum distance, from sequencing read depth (RD) profile and generates a two-dimensional data. Based on the generated data, a two-dimensional null distribution is constructed to test the significance of each genome bin and then the significant genome bins are declared as CNVs. We test the performance of the dpCNV method on a number of simulated datasets and make comparison with several existing methods. The experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method outperforms others in terms of sensitivity and F1-score. We further apply it to a set of real sequencing samples and the results demonstrate the validity of dpCNV. Therefore, we expect that dpCNV can be used as a supplementary to existing methods and may become a routine tool in the field of genome mutation analysis.

Indexed as

copy number variationsdensity peaknext-generation sequencing datanull distributionread depth

Identifiers

PMID33519925
PMCPMC7838601
OpenAlexW3120699274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.