ReviewFrontiers in plant science2020
The Diversity and Dynamics of Sex Determination in Dioecious Plants.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phased-genome assemblies of saltgrass reveal structural dynamics and genomic basis for extreme salt tolerance and dioecy.Plant communications · 2026Article
- BiTUGA: scalable prevalence-based unitig association testing for binary traits.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Sex chromosome evolution mediated by a large inversion and a possible switch of the sex determination gene.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Floral Traits, Pollination and Reproductive Differentiation in GynodioeciousPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Analyses Reveal Mechanisms of Sexual Differentiation and Dimorphism inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Temperature-dependent sex expression in cucurbits and beyond: mechanisms, reproductive plasticity, and breeding implications.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Convergent evolution of sex chromosomes in two palm species, Phoenix dactylifera and Kerriodoxa elegans.Annals of botany · 2025Article
- Reversibility of sex changes in the plant kingdom: more important than we thought?Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025Review
- Rediscovery of the EnigmaticEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- Article
- Balancing selfing and outcrossing: the genetics and cell biology of nematodes with three sexual morphs.Genetics · 2025Review
- Development of sex-specific molecular markers for early sex identification in Hippophae gyantsensis based on whole-genome resequencing.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- X-specific methylation distorts sex.Nature plants · 2024Article
- An explanation for the prevalence of XY over ZW sex determination in species derived from hermaphroditism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Looking for non-hermaphrodite cacti: multidisciplinary studies in Gymnocalycium bruchii endemic to central Argentina.Plant reproduction · 2024Article
- Cleave and Rescue gamete killers create conditions for gene drive in plants.Nature plants · 2024Article
- Article
- Reflections on the ABC model of flower development.The Plant cell · 2024Review
- Cleave and Rescue gamete killers create conditions for gene drive in plants.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Gender specific SNP markers in Coscinium fenestratum (Gaertn.) Colebr. for resource augmentation.Molecular biology reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diversity of inflorescences among flowering plants is captivating. Such charm is not only due to the variety of sizes, shapes, colors, and flowers displayed, but also to the range of reproductive systems. For instance, hermaphrodites occur abundantly throughout the plant kingdom with both stamens and carpels within the same flower. Nevertheless, 10% of flowering plants have separate unisexual flowers, either in different locations of the same individual (monoecy) or on different individuals (dioecy). Despite their rarity, dioecious plants provide an excellent opportunity to investigate the mechanisms involved in sex expression and the evolution of sex-determining regions (SDRs) and sex chromosomes. The SDRs and the evolution of dioecy have been studied in many species ranging from Ginkgo to important fruit crops. Some of these studies, for example in asparagus or kiwifruit, identified two sex-determining genes within the non-recombining SDR and may thus be consistent with the classical model for the evolution of dioecy from hermaphroditism via gynodioecy, that predicts two successive mutations, the first one affecting male and the second one female function, becoming linked in a region of suppressed recombination. On the other hand, aided by genome sequencing and gene editing, single factor sex determination has emerged in other species, such as persimmon or poplar. Despite the diversity of sex-determining mechanisms, a tentative comparative analysis of the known sex-determining genes and candidates in different species suggests that similar genes and pathways may be employed repeatedly for the evolution of dioecy. The cytokinin signaling pathway appears important for sex determination in several species regardless of the underlying genetic system. Additionally, tapetum-related genes often seem to act as male-promoting factors when sex is determined via two genes. We present a unified model that synthesizes the genetic networks of sex determination in monoecious and dioecious plants and will support the generation of hypothesis regarding candidate sex determinants in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.