ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020
Exploring Marine Planktonic Archaea: Then and Now.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring archaeal resources for biomass-derived pentose utilization: pathways, extremozymes, and bioprocessing applications.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Resistance of the Archaeal Community to a Severe Disturbance in an Extreme Alkaline Saline Soil.Current microbiology · 2026Article
- The Ammonia Oxidising Archaeon Nitrosopumilus maritimus Does Not Alter Iodine Oxidation State in Oxic Seawater.Environmental microbiology reports · 2025Article
- Applying the Classic Test dN/dS to Detect Selection in Archaea.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Article
- Uncultivated DPANN archaea are ubiquitous inhabitants of global oxygen deficient zones with diverse metabolic potential.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Distinct patterns of distribution, community assembly and cross-domain co-occurrence of planktonic archaea in four major estuaries of China.Environmental microbiome · 2023Article
- Review
- Picoplankton diversity in an oligotrophic and high salinity environment in the central Adriatic Sea.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Microbial Journey: Mount Everest to Mars.Indian journal of microbiology · 2022Review
- Article
- Genome-enabled exploration of microbial ecology and evolution in the sea: a rising tide lifts all boats.Environmental microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 1977, Woese and Fox leveraged molecular phylogenetic analyses of ribosomal RNAs and identified a new microbial domain of life on Earth, the Archaebacteria (now known as Archaea). At the time of their discovery, only one archaebacterial group, the strictly anaerobic methanogens, was known. But soon, other phenotypically unrelated microbial isolates were shown to belong to the Archaea, many originating from extreme habitats, including extreme halophiles, extreme thermophiles, and thermoacidophiles. Since most Archaea seemed to inhabit extreme or strictly anoxic habitats, it came as a surprise in 1992 when two new lineages of archaea were reported to be abundant in oxygen rich, temperate marine coastal waters and the deep ocean. Since that time, studies of marine planktonic archaea have revealed many more surprises, including their unexpected ubiquity, unusual symbiotic associations, unpredicted physiologies and biogeochemistry, and global abundance. In this Perspective, early work conducted on marine planktonic Archaea by my lab group and others is discussed in terms of the relevant historical context, some of the original research motivations, and surprises and discoveries encountered along the way.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.