Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33519732›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020

Quorum Quenching Activity of the PGPR

Amanda Rosier, Pascale B Beauregard, Harsh P Bais

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Evaluation of Stress-TolerantPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Role of bacterial quorum sensing in plant growth promotion.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Novel Quorum Quenching YtnP Lactonase FromFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amanda RosierDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States.
Pascale B BeauregardDépartement de Biologie, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Harsh P BaisDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) have enormous potential for solving some of the myriad challenges facing our global agricultural system. Intense research efforts are rapidly moving the field forward and illuminating the wide diversity of bacteria and their plant beneficial activities. In the development of better crop solutions using these PGPR, producers are including multiple different species of PGPR in their formulations in a "consortia" approach. While the intention is to emulate more natural rhizomicrobiome systems, the aspect of bacterial interactions has not been properly regarded. By using a tri-trophic model of

Indexed as

agricultureconsortialegumenodulePGPRquorum quenchingquorum sensingsymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID33519732
PMCPMC7843924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.