ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2020
Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacoepidemiology: A Systematic Review. Part 2-Comparison of the Performance of Artificial Intelligence and Traditional Pharmacoepidemiological Techniques.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence-driven prediction of COVID-19-related hospitalization and death: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2023Pooled it
- Article
- How is AI developing in pharmacovigilance?Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2026Article
- Pharmacovigilance in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: Advancements, Challenges, and Considerations.Cureus · 2025Review
- Major areas of interest of artificial intelligence research applied to health care administrative data: a scoping review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- AI-Based Computational Methods in Early Drug Discovery and Post Market Drug Assessment: A Survey.IEEE transactions on computational biology and bioinformaticsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.