Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33519169›Full record

ArticleJournal of microelectromechanical systems : a joint IEEE and ASME publication on microstructures, microactuators, microsensors, and microsystems2020

Multi-Layer Micro-Nanofluidic Device for Isolation and Capture of Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Liposarcoma Cell Conditioned Media.

Prashanth Mohana Sundaram, Lucia Casadei, Gonzalo Lopez, Danielle Braggio, Gita Balakirsky, Raphael Pollock, Shaurya Prakash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microelectromechanical systems : a joint IEEE and ASME publication on microstructures, microactuators, microsensors, and microsystems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Exosome-Based Therapeutics in Dermatology.Biomaterials research · 2025
    Review
  5. Extracellular Vesicles: A New Star for Gene Drug Delivery.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024
    Review
  6. CTC, ctDNA, and Exosome in Thyroid Cancers: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Prashanth Mohana SundaramDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 USA.
Lucia CasadeiComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 USA.
Gonzalo LopezComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 USA.
Danielle BraggioComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 USA.
Gita BalakirskyComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 USA.
Raphael PollockComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 USA.
Shaurya PrakashDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and is also an affiliate of the Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 USA.

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Jennifer A. Woyach · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
Biophysical-based approach for controlling blood vessel structure and functionR01HL141941 · NHLBI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CASTRO, CARLOS E., PRAKASH, SHAURYA · 2018 to 2021
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report on isolation, capture, and subsequent elution for analysis of extracellular vesicles derived from human liposarcoma cell conditioned media, using a multi-layer micro-nanofluidic device operated with tangential flow separation. Our device integrates size-based separation followed by immunoaffinity-based capture of extracellular vesicles in the same device. For liposarcomas, this is the first report on isolating, capturing, and then eluting the extracellular vesicles using a micro-nanofluidic device. The results show a significantly higher yield of the eluted extracellular vesicles (~84%) compared to the current methods of ultracentrifugation (~6%) and ExoQuick-based separations (~16%).

Indexed as

cancerexosomesExtracellular vesiclesliposarcomamicrofluidicsnanofluidics

Identifiers

PMID33519169
PMCPMC7839931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.