Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33519152›Full record

ArticleEthnicity & disease2021

Eliciting the Social Determinants of Cancer Prevention and Control in the Catchment of an Urban Cancer Center.

Katerina Jou, Madeline R Sterling, Rosio Ramos, Francesse Antoine, David M Nanus, Erica Phillips

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ethnicity & disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katerina JouSophie Davis Biomedical Education Program at the CUNY School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Madeline R SterlingDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Rosio RamosDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Francesse AntoineDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
David M NanusDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Erica PhillipsDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Cornell University · USCUNY School of Law · US

Funding

Leveraging Home Health Aides to Improve Outcomes in Heart FailureK23HL150160 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI STERLING, MADELINE R · 2020 to 2024
$921k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL150160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The objectives of this study were two-fold: 1) to engage community stakeholders in identifying the top three social determinant of health (SDOH) barriers to the early detection and treatment of cancer in their respective communities; and 2) to develop a tailored plan responsive to the potential social risks identified within the catchment of an urban academic cancer center. Methods: Stakeholders from four neighborhoods in Brooklyn, New York with disproportionate cancer burden were recruited; the nominal group technique, a semi-quantitative research method, was used to elicit the SDOH barriers. Responses were consolidated into categories and ranked by points received. Results: 112 stakeholders participated in four community-based meetings. The SDOH categories of economic stability, education, and community and social context were identified as the top barriers. The themes of lost wages/employment, competing priorities, and the inability to afford care embodied the responses about economic stability. The domain of education was best described by the themes of low health literacy, targeted health topics to fill gaps in knowledge, and recommendations on the best modalities for improving health knowledge. Lastly, within the category of community and social context, the themes of stigma, bias, and discrimination, eroding support systems, and cultural misconceptions were described. Conclusions: The implications of our study are three-fold. First, they highlight the strengths of the nominal group technique as a methodology for engaging community stakeholders. Second, our analysis led to identifying a smaller set of social priorities for which tailored screening and practical solutions could be implemented within our health care system. Third, the results provide insight into the actual types of interventions and resources that communities expect from the health care sector.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSocial Determinants of HealthDelivery of Health CareEducational StatusEmploymentHumansSocial StigmaCancerNominal Group TechniquePreventionScreeningSocial Determinants of Health

Identifiers

PMID33519152
PMCPMC7843052
OpenAlexW3124636275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.