Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33519079›Full record

ReviewJournal of physical therapy science2021

An overview of fractional anisotropy as a reliable quantitative measurement for the corticospinal tract (CST) integrity in correlation with a Fugl-Meyer assessment in stroke rehabilitation.

Mohd Khairul Izamil Zolkefley, Younis M S Firwana, Hasnettty Zuria Mohamed Hatta, Christina Rowbin, Che Mohd Nasril Che Mohd Nassir, Muhammad Hafiz Hanafi, Mohd Shafie Abdullah, Muzaimi Mustapha

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of physical therapy science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mohd Khairul Izamil ZolkefleyDepartment of Neurosciences, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia: 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Younis M S FirwanaDepartment of Neurosciences, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia: 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Hasnettty Zuria Mohamed HattaDepartment of Neurosciences, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia: 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Christina RowbinDepartment of Neurosciences, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia: 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Che Mohd Nasril Che Mohd NassirDepartment of Neurosciences, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia: 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Muhammad Hafiz HanafiDepartment of Neurosciences, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia: 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Mohd Shafie AbdullahDepartment of Radiology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.
Muzaimi MustaphaDepartment of Neurosciences, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia: 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Universiti Sains Malaysia · MYHospital Universiti Sains Malaysia · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[Purpose] Understanding the essential mechanisms in post-stroke recovery not only provides important basic insights into brain function and plasticity but can also guide the development of new therapeutic approaches for stroke patients. This review aims to give an overview of how various variables of Magnetic Resonance-Diffusion Tensor Imaging (MR-DTI) metrics of fractional anisotropy (FA) can be used as a reliable quantitative measurement and indicator of corticospinal tract (CST) changes, particularly in relation to functional motor outcome correlation with a Fugl-Meyer assessment in stroke rehabilitation. [Methods] PubMed electronic database was searched for the relevant literature, using key words of diffusion tensor imaging (dti), corticospinal tract, and stroke. [Results] We reviewed the role of FA in monitoring CST remodeling and its role of predicting motor recovery after stroke. We also discussed the mechanism of CST remodeling and its modulation from the value of FA and FMA-UE. [Conclusion] Heterogeneity of post-stroke brain disorganization and motor impairment is a recognized challenge in the development of accurate indicators of CST integrity. DTI-based FA measurements offer a reliable and evidence-based indicator for CST integrity that would aid in predicting motor recovery within the context of stroke rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Corticospinal tractFractional anisotropyStroke

Identifiers

PMID33519079
PMCPMC7829559
OpenAlexW3119809544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.