ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2021
Intra-rater reliability of measurement of abdominal perimuscular connective tissue thickness on ultrasound images.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Technical aspects of inter-recti distance measurement with ultrasonographic imaging for physiotherapy purposes: the scoping review.Insights into imaging · 2023Review
- Nutritional Genomic Approach for Improving Grain Protein Content in Wheat.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] The thickness of the perimuscular connective tissue (PMCT) reflects muscular atrophy and decreased flexibility that may cause low back pain. However, few studies have used ultrasound imaging to measure PMCT thickness. We aimed to examine and confirm the reliability of ultrasound in measuring the thickness of the PMCT of the abdominal wall muscle. [Participants and Methods] The participants were 38 healthy adult males without chronic back pain. The images were acquired in B mode with the participants in the supine position and the PMCT thickness of the abdominal wall muscle was measured on the images. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to confirm reliability. [Results] The ICC for both within-day and between-day PMCT measurements by ultrasound were 0.7-0.9. The 95% confidence interval ranged from 0.5-0.9. The standard error of measurement (SEM) was 0.02-0.1 mm in the abdominal wall muscle and 0.5 mm in the interrecti distance (IRD). The 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the minimum detectable change (MDC95) was 0.1-0.3 mm in the abdominal wall muscle and 1.3-1.4 mm in the IRD. [Conclusion] We conducted a study to confirm the reliability of ultrasound-based measurement of PMCT thickness of the abdominal wall muscle, and the ICC results established reliability. However, since the values measured were small (0.02-1.4 mm) and there is a limit to visual observation, it was necessary to measure using computer software.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.